Reference health
Measuring the Civic Duty to Vote: A Proposal
2 of 48 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-26
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
27 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0278-6133.16.5.433
does not resolve to a known work10.1017/s000305540011562x
The 46 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1017/s0003055408080210
The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting
resolves10.1080/15298868.2014.892529
My Country, My Self: Honor, Identity, and Defensive Responses to National Threats
resolves10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review
resolves10.1080/10705519509540000
Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices
resolves10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00188.x
Is it Rational to Vote? Five Types of Answer and a Suggestion
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00577.x
Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation
resolves10.1017/s0007123411000020
Expressive Political Behaviour: Foundations, Scope and Implications
resolves10.1177/0146167203259930
Social Desirability and Self-Reports: Testing Models of Socially Desirable Responding
resolves10.1111/0162-895x.00119
For Shame! The Effect of Community Cooperative Context on the Probability of Voting
resolves10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis
resolves10.1080/09515089.2012.727135
The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior
The 27 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedConceptualizing Public Opinion
no DOI — not checkedCross-Cultural Equivalence with Structural Equation Modeling
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedVoter choice: Evaluating political alternatives
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedComparing questions with agree/disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref74
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2650481"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2650481/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2650481)