Reference health

Cross-Fertilisation, Clarity and Consistency at an Overburdened European Court of Human Rights The Case of the Discrimination Grounds Under Article 14 ECHR

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666951
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 14 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-25

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

51 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1787/rev_fish-2011-12-en
The 13 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1163/15718130020617549
Thlimmenos v. Greece
resolves10.18356/4e8955b4-en-fr
No. 35245. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and South Africa
resolves10.1201/b16003
Renewable Resources and Renewable Energy
resolves10.1007/978-94-007-0131-1_5
The Natural Potential of Mountains in Bulgaria and Its Sustainable Use
resolves10.1159/000360915
Subject Index Vol. 32, No. 5, 2014
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2875230
The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine, the Very Weighty Reasons Test and Grounds of Discrimination
resolves10.5771/9783845266190-482
Directive 79/7/EEC on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security
resolves10.1163/ej.9789004157187.i-340.84
Chapter 12. The Burden of Proof and Indirect Discrimination
resolves10.3390/proceedings2130967
Modelling a Holographic Particle Counter
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-14432-5_25
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott Delivered on 26 March 2009
resolves10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1_9
Searching for Maximum Feasible Simplicity: The Case of e-Curia at the Court of Justice of the European Union
The 51 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedThe Scope and Balancing of Rights: Diagnostic or Constitutive
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedThe European Court of Justice and its Relations with the European Court of Human Rights: The Quest for Enhanced Reliance
no DOI — not checkedJudicial) Love is Not a One-Way street: The EU Preliminary Reference Procedure as a Model for ECtHR Advisory Opinions under Protocol No
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedThe Prism of Fundamental Rights' (2012) 8 EuConst 173, 188. In the context of the Convention's non-discrimination law see also Gerards
no DOI — not checkedGerards and Senden (n 127) 625, however, point out how an increased emphasis on the first level of analysis (scope of rights) implies classic methods of legal interpretation and a heavier burden of proof for applicants
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedEquality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedLimitations and opportunities: a review of the likely domestic impact of Art. 14 ECHR' (2001) 6 E
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedLaw of the European Convention on Human Rights (2 nd edn
no DOI — not checkedAnalysis of statistics
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedAlso Brighton Declaration (n 4) paras 25(c)-(e)
no DOI — not checkedArticle 3 and amended Rule 72 in European Court of Human Rights
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2666951"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2666951/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2666951/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2666951)