Reference health

Is There a Valuation Gap? The Case of Interval Valuations

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2696923
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 55 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01673537
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/b97478.pdf
The 53 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/3146458
Experiments on the Difference between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept
resolves10.1162/00335530360535153
"Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2013.10.002
Bidding behavior given point and interval values in a second-price auction
resolves10.1287/opre.30.5.961
Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1582853
Approach to Analysis of Self-Selected Interval Data
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2071077
Two-Step Approach to Self-Selected Interval Data in Elicitation Surveys
resolves10.14357/19922264150301
ANALYSIS OF SURVEY DATA CONTAINING ROUNDED CENSORING INTERVALS
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00008.x
Eliciting Reservation Prices: Becker–<scp>De</scp>Groot–Marschak Mechanisms<i>vs.</i>Markets
resolves10.2307/1244370
Anchoring and Adjustment in Single‐Bounded, Contingent‐Valuation Questions
resolves10.1007/s10640-005-6028-0
Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis
resolves10.2307/3146963
Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(88)90054-6
Decision difficulty and imprecise preferences
resolves10.1257/000282807780323406
Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2011.05.008
Imprecision as an account of violations of independence and betweenness
resolves10.1016/0749-5978(87)90043-4
Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses
resolves10.1016/0022-2496(67)90042-9
Testing expectation theories of decision making without measuring utility or subjective probability
resolves10.2307/1884223
The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value
resolves10.1007/bf01064181
Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity
resolves10.1111/1468-0335.00106
Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation
resolves10.1037/e683162011-083
A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion
resolves10.2307/3146711
How Precise Are Monetary Representations of Environmental Improvements?
resolves10.1007/s10640-007-9102-y
A new valuation question: analysis of and insights from interval open-ended data in contingent valuation
resolves10.1257/000282803321455449
Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Reply
resolves10.1006/jeem.2001.1215
A Review of WTA/WTP Studies
resolves10.1006/obhd.1994.1093
Buying/Selling Price Preference Reversals: Preference for Environmental Changes in Buying versus Selling Modes
resolves10.1257/aer.101.2.991
The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment
resolves10.1086/261737
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
resolves10.2307/1914185
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
resolves10.2307/1885962
Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value
resolves10.1162/00335530360535144
Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.x
Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00108
Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets?
resolves10.2307/2232669
Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
resolves10.1080/21606544.2013.876941
Exploring the determinants of uncertainty in contingent valuation surveys
resolves10.1198/jbes.2009.08098
Rounding Probabilistic Expectations in Surveys
resolves10.1016/s0165-1765(98)00049-4
Understanding the disparity between WTP and WTA: endowment effect, substitutability, or imprecise preferences?
resolves10.4337/9781781009079.00013
Value and outcome uncertainty as explanations for the WTA vs WTP disparity
resolves10.1002/bdm.448
The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity
resolves10.1257/0002828054201387
The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-27670-5
The Economics of Evaluating Water Projects
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-36790-8
Evaluating Water Projects
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511840609.004
An Overview of Quantitative Policy Analysis
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.003
Endowment effects in contests
resolves10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
A theory of anticipated utility
resolves10.1006/jeem.1995.1040
Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2004.07.002
Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA–WTP disparity: A meta analytical framework
resolves10.1007/s11166-008-9040-2
Third-generation prospect theory
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework.
resolves10.1016/s0928-7655(00)00038-5
Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA
resolves10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2014.06.001
A new meta-analysis on the WTP/WTA disparity
resolves10.1007/bf00122574
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
resolves10.1016/s0020-7373(84)80009-7
A model for the interpretation of verbal predictions
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedAn Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a Source of the WTA-WTP Disparity
no DOI — not checkedMeasuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedEvaluating the Validity of the Dichotomous Choice Question Format in Contingent Valuation
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedDoes Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species
no DOI — not checkedResolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2696923"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2696923/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2696923/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2696923)