Reference health
The Role of Emotional Language in Briefs Before the U.S. Supreme Court
1 of 42 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
34 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1017/s0003055408080283
Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court
resolves10.1017/s0003055409990049
The Constraining Capacity of Legal Doctrine on the U.S. Supreme Court
resolves10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00067.x
Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation
resolves10.2307/797418
Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals
resolves10.1086/651511
Inferring the Winning Party in the Supreme Court from the Pattern of Questioning at Oral Argument
resolves10.1073/pnas.1500355112
A decline in prosocial language helps explain public disapproval of the US Congress
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00872.x
Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message‐relevant thinking
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00262.x
The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Study of Conflict Cases
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.
resolves10.1093/pan/10.2.134
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
resolves10.1080/10510978109368075
Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades
resolves10.2307/2960277
Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00464.x
Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
resolves10.2307/1964234
Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court
resolves10.1177/1532673x13502219
Examining the Effects of Information, Attorney Capability, and Amicus Participation on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making
resolves10.1177/0261927x09351676
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
resolves10.1017/s0022381608090142
The Tenth Justice? Consequences of Politicization in the Solicitor General's Office
resolves10.1093/jopart/mui042
Sweet-Talking the Fourth Branch: The Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking
The 34 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedCompetent Appellate Advocacy and Continuing Legal Education: Fitting the Means to the End
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedLegalese v. Plain Langauge: An Empirical Study of Persuasion and Credibility in Appellate Brief Writing
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedThe Language of Supreme Court Briefs: A LargeScale Quantitative Investigation
no DOI — not checkedGrammatical and Structural Choices in Issue Framing: A Quantitative Analysis of Questions Presented from a Half Century of Supreme Court Briefs
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedMapping Out the Strategic Terrain: The Informational Role of Amici Curiae
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedGot Issues? An Empirical Study About Framing Them
no DOI — not checkedPersuading Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Writing Style, Persuasion, and the Use of Plain English
no DOI — not checkedInterviews with United States Supreme Court Justices
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedInquiring Minds Want to Know: Do Justices Tip Their Hands With Their Questions at Oral Arguments in the
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedThe Structure and Function of Communication in Society
no DOI — not checkedCriminal Deputy Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice
no DOI — not checkedWhat's the Diference? Comparing the Advocacy Preferences of State and Federal Appellate Judges
no DOI — not checkedClearly, Using Intensifiers Is Very Bad, Or Is It?
no DOI — not checkedDoes the Readability of Your Brief Affect Your Chance of Winning An Appeal?
no DOI — not checkedWhen Justices (Subconsciously) Attack: The Theory of Argumentative Threat and the Supreme Court
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedThe Institutionalization of the
no DOI — not checkedEffective Appellate Advocacy
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedAdvocacy and Emotion
no DOI — not checkedSome Suggestions on Preparing Briefs on the Merits in the Supreme Court of the United States
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref76
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2703875"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2703875/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2703875)