Reference health
Out-of-Sample Exchange Rate Predictability with Real-Time Data
1 of 33 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/1392185
The 32 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1162/003465399558454
Measuring Business Cycles: Approximate Band-Pass Filters for Economic Time Series
resolves10.1016/j.jimonfin.2005.08.002
Empirical exchange rate models of the nineties: Are any fit to survive?
resolves10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00071-9
Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing for nested models
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.014
Using out-of-sample mean squared prediction errors to test the martingale difference hypothesis
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.023
Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested models
resolves10.1086/ma.22.25554969
Exchange Rate Models Are Not as Bad as You Think [with Comments and Discussion]
resolves10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.12.004
Forecasting exchange rates out-of-sample with panel methods and real-time data
resolves10.1016/j.econmod.2013.05.023
The (un)reliability of real-time output gap estimates with revised data
resolves10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.06.002
Taylor rule deviations and out-of-sample exchange rate predictability
resolves10.1081/etc-200040785
In-Sample or Out-of-Sample Tests of Predictability: Which One Should We Use?
resolves10.1080/07350015.2012.693850
Out-of-Sample Forecast Tests Robust to the Choice of Window Size
resolves10.20955/wp.2012.030
Comment on 'Taylor Rule Exchange Rate Forecasting During the Financial Crisis'
resolves10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.11.001
Out-of-sample exchange rate predictability with Taylor rule fundamentals
resolves10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.07.003
Taylor rules with real-time data: A tale of two countries and one exchange rate
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedExchange Rate and Fundamentals: Evidence on Long-Horizon Predictability
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedThe Out of Sample Failure of Empirical Exchange Rate Models
no DOI — not checkedHow Accurate Are Real-Time Estimates of Output Trends and Gaps?
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2709843"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2709843/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2709843)