Reference health

Nudge vs. Boost: Agency Dynamics Under 'Libertarian Paternalism'

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2711166
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 31 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1509/0743-9156-32.2.159
The 30 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
Social norms and energy conservation
resolves10.1056/nejmoa0810696
Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial
resolves10.1093/jnci/djs206
Response: Re: Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up
resolves10.1177/0956797612437428
Psychological Research and the Prostate-Cancer Screening Controversy
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3
The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1677168
As-If Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise?
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02448.x
Do Educated Leaders Matter?
resolves10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_10
The Ethics of Nudge
resolves10.2307/3312889
Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for "Asymmetric Paternalism"
resolves10.1093/rfs/hht025
Libertarian Paternalism, Information Production, and Financial Decision Making: Table 1
resolves10.1111/jeea.12011
ENERGY CONSERVATION “NUDGES” AND ENVIRONMENTALIST IDEOLOGY: EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY FIELD EXPERIMENT
resolves10.1017/s0003055410000535
Competing on Good Politicians
resolves10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.04.008
So closed: Political selection in proportional systems
resolves10.1037/0033-295x.102.4.684
How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.
resolves10.2307/1885092
Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic
resolves10.1016/0167-2681(92)90078-p
Testing bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidence
resolves10.1007/s00355-011-0636-0
Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles
resolves10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9
Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory?
resolves10.1257/aer.103.7.2643
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts
resolves10.1126/science.290.5500.2261
Communicating Statistical Information
resolves10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_3
Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness
resolves10.1017/s0140525x00041157
The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges
resolves10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.06.001
Choice in politics: Equivalency framing in economic policy decisions and the influence of expertise
resolves10.1126/science.1226918
Changing Human Behavior to Prevent Disease: The Importance of Targeting Automatic Processes
resolves10.5860/choice.50-4698
Taking liberties: a critical examination of Libertarian paternalism
resolves10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.380
Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours.
resolves10.1007/s10602-008-9043-7
Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism
resolves10.2307/1600573
Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron
resolves10.2202/1145-6396.1248
Are Regulators Rational?
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedBehavioral law and economics: Its origins, fatal flaws, and implications for liberty
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2711166"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2711166/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2711166/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2711166)