Reference health

<div> The Time-Varying and Asymmetric Importance <span>of the Drivers of Influential Revisions</span> </div>

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2712021
CiteStamped reference-health badge
52/52 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-14

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 52 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.04.005
On the information role of stock recommendation revisions
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.01.002
Information content of equity analyst reports
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00336
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.001
Buys, holds, and sells: The distribution of investment banks’ stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts’ recommendations
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.004
Comparing the stock recommendation performance of investment banks and independent research firms
resolves10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01083.x
Ratings Changes, Ratings Levels, and the Predictive Value of Analysts’ Recommendations
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00226
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
resolves10.1111/jofi.12607
Comparing Asset Pricing Models
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(83)90056-9
Biases in computed returns
resolves10.1017/S002210900000243X
Analysts, Industries, and Price Momentum
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00245.x
Investor Reaction to Celebrity Analysts: The Case of Earnings Forecast Revisions
resolves10.1111/fima.12037
Bucking the Trend: The Informativeness of Analyst Contrarian Recommendations
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2013.1751
Analyst Recommendations, Mutual Fund Herding, and Overreaction in Stock Prices
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.08.010
Analysts’ stock ownership and stock recommendations
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00067-8
Following the leader:
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm075
Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/ <i>N</i> Portfolio Strategy?
resolves10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2357
Do All-Stars Shine? Evaluation of Analyst Recommendations
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00490
Differences of Opinion and the Cross Section of Stock Returns
resolves10.1007/s11142-021-09645-1
Social media analysts and sell-side analyst research
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00043-4
Factors affecting investment bank initial public offering market share
resolves10.1017/S0022109016000831
Optimal Option Portfolio Strategies: Deepening the Puzzle of Index Option Mispricing
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05202.x
Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01054.x
The Value Premium and the CAPM
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
A five-factor asset pricing model
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012
Choosing factors
resolves10.1017/S0022109000002404
The Value of Client Access to Analyst Recommendations
resolves10.1093/rof/rfy032
Which Factors?
resolves10.1093/rof/rfaa004
An Augmented <i>q</i> -Factor Model with Expected Growth
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhu068
Digesting Anomalies: An Investment Approach
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106787
How informative are insider trades and analyst recommendations?
resolves10.1016/j.finmar.2009.07.002
The value of combining the information content of analyst recommendations and target prices
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101339
Seemingly inconsistent analyst revisions
resolves10.1016/j.finmar.2006.05.001
Value of analyst recommendations: International evidence
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhp093
Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn109
Conflicts of Interest and Stock Recommendations: The Effects of the Global Settlement and Related Regulations
resolves10.2308/accr-52446
Sell-Side Analysts' Benchmarks
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2385
Do Earnings Estimates Add Value to Sell-Side Analysts’ Investment Recommendations?
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00045-9
Why do firms switch underwriters?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01484.x
Rewriting History
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.009
Do accurate earnings forecasts facilitate superior investment recommendations?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhq094
When Are Analyst Recommendation Changes Influential?
resolves10.1111/jofi.12611
Is Sell‐Side Research More Valuable in Bad Times?
resolves10.1111/jofi.12365
Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability?
resolves10.2307/2491458
Do Security Analysts Improve Their Performance with Experience?
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.11.001
Do security analysts exhibit persistent differences in stock picking ability?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhv063
A Taxonomy of Anomalies and Their Trading Costs
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhw107
Mispricing Factors
resolves10.2469/faj.v51.n5.1933
The Anatomy of the Performance of Buy and Sell Recommendations
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05205.x
Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMeasuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks
no DOI — not checkedThe market for borrowing stock
no DOI — not checkedAre stars' opinions worth more? The relation between analyst reputation and recommendation values
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedCan star analysts make superior coverage decisions in poor information environment
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref56
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-10-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2712021"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2712021/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2712021/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2712021)