Reference health
The Old Boy Network: The Impact of Professional Networks on Remuneration in Top Executive Jobs
2 of 40 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-26
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
10 with no DOI or arXiv id: not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is checked only when it names an arXiv id, under that id’s DataCite
DOI. The rest are never matched by title or guessed at; they stay outside the checked set, and
this line says so.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1993.3997507
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.86
The 38 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.38What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997).
resolves10.1086/693869Do Job Networks Disadvantage Women? Evidence from a Recruitment Experiment in Malawi
resolves10.2307/1131268Greater Preference among Females Than Males for Dyadic Interaction in Early Childhood
resolves10.1257/app.2.3.228Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors
resolves10.1007/s10490-005-4116-xCareer Success Networks in China: Sex Differences in Network Composition and Social Exchange Practices
resolves10.2307/2578351A Research Note on Friendship, Gender, and the Life Cycle
resolves10.1002/job.253Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women?
resolves10.1086/666615Gender Differences in Executive Compensation and Job Mobility
resolves10.2307/2787014Paving an Alternative Route: Gender Differences in Managerial Networks
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1526948Who Gets the Carrot and Who Gets the Stick? Evidence of Gender Disparities in Executive Remuneration
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2717988The Old Boy Network: The Impact of Professional Networks on Remuneration in Top Executive Jobs
resolves10.1002/smj.575She'‐e‐os: gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments
resolves10.2307/2095868Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks
resolves10.1093/rfs/hht019Executive Networks and Firm Policies: Evidence from the Random Assignment of MBA Peers
resolves10.1177/001979391306600204Why are So Few Females Promoted into CEO and Vice President Positions? Danish Empirical Evidence, 1997–2007
The 10 references with no DOI or arXiv id, listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedMen's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedGender differences in networking
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref50
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
with neither a DOI nor an arXiv id.
checked 2026-08-26 — re-checked at most once a day, when someone opens
this page, so the date shown is the last check; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not
part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge shows the date of its last check, which runs at most once a day, when someone opens this page.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2717988"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2717988/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2717988)