Reference health
'Getting the Government Out of Marriage' Post Obergefell: The Ill-Considered Consequences of Transforming the Statees Relationship to Marriage
1 of 17 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
63 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1755-6333.2010.01046.x
The 16 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1086/423155
Is Making Divorce Easier Bad for Children? The Long‐Run Implications of Unilateral Divorce
resolves10.1089/glr.2006.10.295
Campo Band of Mission Indians v. Superior Court,
<i>137 Cal. App. 4th 175 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006).</i>
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u200765
Munro, Sir Thomas, (1866–11 April 1923), JP, DL; County Clerk of Lanarkshire; Clerk to County of Lanark Education Authority; Clerk to the Lanark District Board of Control
resolves10.4135/9781506333496.n26
Supreme Court Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage Nationwide: June 26, 2015
The 63 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDid Unilateral Divorce Raise Divorce Rates? Evidence from Panel Data
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedResponse to Reviewers of THE WESTERN CASE
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedAttitudinal Theory, supra note 193, at 340. Legislators are in the business of "correctly judging approval patterns;" new laws may signal to the public previously "private information about such patterns
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedstate-out-of-marriage (observing that if churches "step[ped] in to fill the void left by the state . . . this solution would actually empower religious institutions' influence over culture all the more."). 278. Individuals with no religious affilitiation, or "nones," make up twenty-three percent of our population, up from sixteen percent in 2007. Michael Lipka, A Closer Look at America's Rapidly Growing Religious 'Nones
no DOI — not checkedThe ALI Principles and Agreements: Seeking a Balance Between Status and Contract
no DOI — not checkedThere is a dearth of empirical research on whether couples enter agreements, however. MERLE WEINER, A PARENT-PARTNER STATUS FOR
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedbefore a court can decide whether it is unjust for the defendant to retain benefits from the relationship, the court must make judgments about the level and type of commitment in the relationship
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checked13 (discussing risks for relationships when individuals "slide into a marriage
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedat the back end, instead of at the front end when the couple decides to marry. Strauss, supra note 82, at 1310. Consequently, couples will have less notice of what those norms will be. 307. Three states, Arkansas, Arizona, and Louisiana, recognize a form of marriage known as "covenant marriage
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedMarriage Against the State: Toward a New View of Civil Marriage
no DOI — not checkedFor a pair of competing views on the value of family autonomy, see Lee E. Teitelbaum, Family History and Family Law
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedfalls short, the other would have an incentive to insist on prompt performance; otherwise, a court might later interpret his acquiescence as a rescission of the original arrangement. If the personal or relational aspects of their relationship are enforceable as well, then those aspects too must be monitored. When one stops contributing to the relationship, that breach may justify [the other spouse] to breach other aspects, such as providing domestic services
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedId. In this scheme, there would be no practical or legal differences between marriages and civil unions, although symbolic differences might exist. Id. Creating a parallel civil union has the dual advantage of affirming the State's "fully legitimate interest in the promotion of private associations that can promote the well-being of dependents," while "jettison[ing] [the State's] apparent interest in the sexual and reproductive choices of competent adults
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedThe Precarious Status of Domestic Partnerships for the Elderly in a Post-Obergefell World, 24 Elder L
no DOI — not checkedIs the Full Faith and Credit Clause Still Irrelevant to Same-Sex Marriage?: Toward a Reconsideration of the Conventional Wisdom, 89 IND
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedBargaining for Religious Accommodations: Same-Sex Marriage and LGBT Rights after Hobby Lobby, in THE RISE OF CORPORATE RELIGIOUS LIBERTY supra note 185, at 257, 266. 332. See S.B. 296, 60th Leg
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedCould Religious Institutions Lose Tax-Exempt Status over Supreme Court's Gay Marriage Case?
no DOI — not checkedProfessor Douglas Laycock believes that no "administration of either party would try to deny a tax exemption . . . based on [a religious institution's] views on homosexuality" until "gay rights looks like race does today, where you have a handful of crackpots still resisting
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedTo block federal revocation of tax exemption or other adverse action against religious groups, Senator Mike Lee introduced the First Amendment Defense Act. Mike Lee, Op-Ed., Sen. Mike Lee: First Amendment Defense Act Protects Critical 'Space of Freedom
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedAn employer may not discharge, demote, terminate, or refuse to hire any person, or retaliate against, harass, or discriminate in matters of compensation or in terms, privileges, and conditions of employment against any person otherwise qualified, for lawful expression or expressive activity outside of the workplace regarding the person's religious, political, or personal convictions, including convictions about marriage, family, or sexuality, unless the expression or expressive activity is in direct conflict with the essential business-related interests of the employer."). Cf. Conor Friedersdorf, Mozilla's Gay-Marriage Litmus Test Violates Liberal Values
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checked296, 60th Leg
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref78
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedref80
no DOI — not checkedref81
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2742272"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2742272/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2742272)