Reference health
Determinants of Individual Investment Decisions in Investment-Based Crowdfunding
1 of 61 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.58.4.568
The 60 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1017/s0022109000002702
Do Behavioral Biases Vary across Individuals? Evidence from Individual Level 401(k) Data
resolves10.1111/jems.12093
Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00388
Excessive Extrapolation and the Allocation of 401(k) Accounts to Company Stock
resolves10.1111/etap.12139
Does the Possibility to Make Equity Investments in Crowdfunding Projects Crowd Out Reward–Based Investments?
resolves10.1111/etap.12118
Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00098-6
Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: the influence of colleagues’ choices
resolves10.1080/00223980.1988.9915532
The Gender Gap on Wall Street: An Empirical Analysis of Confidence in Investment Decision Making
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008
CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation
resolves10.1080/13691066.2011.642147
Institutional investments in private equity funds: social ties and the reduction of information asymmetry
resolves10.1080/13691066.2014.916512
Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2255944
Why Crowdfunding Projects Can Succeed: The Role of Proponents’ Individual and Territorial Social Capital
resolves10.5465/ambpp.2015.18365abstract
"Leaning In or Leaning On? Gender, Homophily, and Activism in Crowdfunding"
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00355
How Distance, Language, and Culture Influence Stockholdings and Trades
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00182.x
Does Gender Matter? Women Business Angels and the Supply of Entrepreneurial Finance
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00817.x
Thy Neighbor's Portfolio: Word‐of‐Mouth Effects in the Holdings and Trades of Money Managers
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.005
Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives?
resolves10.1093/revfin/hhm009
Information Diffusion Effects in Individual Investors' Common Stock Purchases: Covet Thy Neighbors' Investment Choices
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2334590
Does Crowdfunding Democratize Access to Capital? A Geographical Analysis
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2234765
Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers in Kickstarter
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560
Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002
Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction☆
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2442954
Gender Dynamics in Crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on Entrepreneurs, Investors, Deals and Taste Based Discrimination
resolves10.1111/etap.12269
How Should Crowdfunding Research Evolve? A Survey of the
<i>Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice</i>
Editorial Board
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00076.x
How Behavioral Finance Can Inform Retirement Plan Design<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1007/s11187-016-9825-7
Gender differences in the contribution patterns of equity-crowdfunding investors
resolves10.1111/j.1755-053x.2010.01093.x
Peer Effects in the Trading Decisions of Individual Investors
resolves10.1007/s11187-016-9829-3
The wisdom of the crowd in funding: information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.10.018
Does success bring success? The post-offering lives of equity-crowdfunded firms
resolves10.1111/etap.12272
The Influence of Internal Social Capital on Serial Creators’ Success in Crowdfunding
resolves10.1037//0022-3514.58.4.582
Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others.
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedGender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2746398"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2746398/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2746398)