Reference health
Does Environmental Policy Stringency Foster Innovation and Productivity in OECD Countries?
1 of 31 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-05
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/eco_studies-2014-5jz2drqml75j
The 30 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/1467-8276.00041
Productivity Growth and Environmental Regulation in Mexican and U.S. Food Manufacturing
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1754674
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
resolves10.1162/00346530152480144
Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Evidence from Oil Refineries
resolves10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00058-x
Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.004
On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1802489
Impact of Environmental Regulations on Trade in the Main EU Countries: Conflict or Synergy?
resolves10.3386/w18392
The Effects of Environmental Regulation on the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing
resolves10.1080/00036846.2013.857005
Determinants of trade with solar energy technology components: evidence on the porter hypothesis?
resolves10.1787/5js03z98mvr7-en
The Use of Patent Statistics for International Comparisons and Analysis of Narrow Technological Fields
resolves10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.12.001
Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5
Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology
resolves10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4
Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis
resolves10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00301.x
Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00203-7
Win–win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries
resolves10.1257/jep.9.4.119
Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.001
Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2005.04.006
International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany
resolves10.1007/s10640-013-9671-x
Environmental Innovations and Firm Profitability: Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedHow MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis Econ
no DOI — not checkedInnovation and Environmental Stringency: The Case of Sulfur Dioxide Abatement
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedLinking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: evidence from patenting in the U
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedAmerica's green strategy
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-05 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2764834"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2764834/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2764834)