Reference health
(Competition Policy and Incentives for Innovation)
27/27 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 27 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041965
INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY, AND MARKET STRUCTURE
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00014-0
Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry
resolves10.1016/s1573-448x(89)02006-6
Chapter 18 Empirical studies of innovation and market structure
resolves10.2307/2601000
Competitive Pressure: The Effects on Investments in Product and Process Innovation
resolves10.1016/s0014-2921(97)00036-6
Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: An example
resolves10.2307/3585017
How High Are the Giants' Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth
resolves10.1086/ipe.1.25056143
Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting
resolves10.2307/2696400
The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995
resolves10.2307/1342701
Constitutional Law. Regulatory Takings. Federal Circuit's Holding Introduces Subjective Factors into Takings Clause "Denominator" Analysis. Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United States, 208 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.), aff'd on reh'g, 231 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511492570.003
Competition policy and game-theory: reflections based on the cement industry case
resolves10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01053.x
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY, COMPETITION AND INNOVATION
resolves10.2307/2393356
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
resolves10.7551/mitpress/3787.003.0007
Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition–Innovation Debate?
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedMarket Structure and Innovation: A Survey
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref51
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2767410"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2767410/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2767410)