Reference health

Deliberation Favours Social Efficiency by Making People Disregard Their Relative Shares: Evidence from US and India

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2799850
CiteStamped reference-health badge
4 of 81 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.73.4.733
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-2909.119.1.3
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.127
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1252
The 77 checked references that resolve
resolves10.4159/9780674042605
A Theory of Justice
resolves10.1126/science.1153651
The Right and the Good: Distributive Justice and Neural Encoding of Equity and Efficiency
resolves10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01008-6
Chapter 8 The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories
resolves10.1038/srep06025
Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game
resolves10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00214
Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior
resolves10.1162/003355302760193904
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
resolves10.1162/003355399556151
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2
Motivational bases of choice in experimental games
resolves10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00287
The cognitive basis of social behavior: cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives
resolves10.1098/rspb.2012.2043
Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders
resolves10.1257/0002828042002741
Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0072427
A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
resolves10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning
resolves10.1038/ncomms8455
Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference
resolves10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006
Promoting cooperation in the field
resolves10.1006/obhd.2000.2915
Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups
resolves10.1002/hbm.22649
Neural signatures of fairness‐related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate‐based meta‐analysis
resolves10.1037/a0031021
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach.
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018
Time and moral judgment
resolves10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.011
Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian
resolves10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00146
Social preferences and cognitive reflection: evidence from a dictator game experiment
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2676419
Impulsive Behavior in Competition: Testing Theories of Overbidding in Rent-Seeking Contests
resolves10.1257/aer.99.2.93
Egalitarianism and Competitiveness
resolves10.1257/089533005775196732
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
resolves10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test
resolves10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532
Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
resolves10.1017/S1930297500007622
Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test
resolves10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
resolves10.1038/nature17160
Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2720585
From Good Institutions to Good Norms: Top-Down Incentives to Cooperate Foster Prosociality But Not Norm Enforcement
resolves10.1080/02185370802504266
Curbing Corruption in India: An Impossible Dream?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2559182
Social Setting, Intuition, and Experience in Lab Experiments Interact to Shape Cooperative Decision-Making
resolves10.1257/aer.98.2.494
Spite and Development
resolves10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.01.023
Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D:4D) predict cognitive reflection?
resolves10.1038/ncomms4677
Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation
resolves10.1038/srep27219
Rethinking spontaneous giving: Extreme time pressure and ego-depletion favor self-regarding reactions
resolves10.1007/s10683-015-9463-y
Fairness is intuitive
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.12.007
Intuitive help and punishment in the field
resolves10.1038/nature11467
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
resolves10.1073/pnas.1517780113
Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation
resolves10.1037/xge0000154
Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men.
resolves10.1177/0956797615585115
Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes
resolves10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00300
Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality
resolves10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003
Human cooperation
resolves10.1038/nature12194
Intuition and cooperation reconsidered
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0096654
Does Intuition Cause Cooperation?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2531634
Smart or Selfish - When Smart Guys Finish Nice
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0073131
The Effect of $1, $5 and $10 Stakes in an Online Dictator Game
resolves10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00148-4
Market efficiency in real time
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2013.1711
<i>Tempus Fugit</i>: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions
resolves10.1257/00028280260344632
Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet
resolves10.3390/g6040458
Cooperate without Looking in a Non-Repeated Game
resolves10.1073/pnas.1417904112
Cooperate without looking: Why we care what people think and not just what they do
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2679326
To Know or Not to Know? Looking at Payoffs Signals Selfish Behavior, But It Does Not Actually Mean So
resolves10.1073/pnas.1601280113
Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.004
Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.007
Too fatigued to care: Ego depletion, guilt, and prosocial behavior
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.002
The hungry thief: Physiological deprivation and its effects on unethical behavior
resolves10.1038/srep09916
The emergence of hyper-altruistic behaviour in conflictual situations
resolves10.1073/pnas.1408988111
Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making
resolves10.2307/2941024
The Evolution of Human Altruism
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0109687
Risking Your Life without a Second Thought: Intuitive Decision-Making and Extreme Altruism
resolves10.1017/S1930297500002205
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
resolves10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9
The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market
resolves10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004
The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments
resolves10.1093/pan/mpr057
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
resolves10.1177/0963721414531598
Inside the Turk
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0031461
Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes
resolves10.1006/game.1994.1021
Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.048
Does stake size matter for cooperation and punishment?
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2005.03.007
Does stake size matter in trust games?
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01415.x
RAISING THE STAKES IN THE ULTIMATUM GAME: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2884409
Conducting Interactive Experiments Online
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003
The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography
resolves10.1017/S1930297500001819
Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedCooperation, fast and slow: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation
no DOI — not checkedIntuitive cooperation Refuted: Commentary on
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref90
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2799850"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2799850/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2799850/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2799850)