Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 29 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checked2009) (injury found based on expenses incurred because of organization's "need to care for animals
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedSo too, because he was white, he was not lied to. Given Havens confirmed that, for organizational standing, "we conduct the same inquiry as in the case of an individual
no DOI — not checkedUpon reaching that conclusion, isolating the injury's genesis becomes tractable. Only one distinction explains HOME's standing and Willis' lack thereof as a tester. That is, HOME counseled Coles and Coles was subsequently, illegally, given information undermining HOME's service. Willis performed no such service. Havens' lie to Coles, then, triggered HOME's injury. 220 But the question remains, why and how? HOME was not seeking to live in Havens' apartment. Nor was HOME the party actually lied to and thus denied truthful information under the Fair Housing Act. Moreover, this construction of the injury does not neatly align with Arlington Heights
no DOI — not checkedHOME's pre-illegality expenses were not its injury "is the Court's denial of standing to the white tester"). The same scholar proffered three alternative explanations for the injury but I find none persuasive. First, HOME was not "obligated to spend more money educating and counseling" individuals after Havens' illegality came to light. Id. at 592. Any counseling it did (or did not) perform after the illegality was purely volitional. Second, it was not injured because it was unable thereafter "to refer clients to [Havens], thus limiting the available choices it could provide clients
no DOI — not checkedPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. United States Dep't of Agriculture, 797 F.3d 1087, 1100 (D.C
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checked) (individuals were CAAN members). Moreover, the plaintiffs (1) never argued that the organization had standing in its own right (2) alleged injury only via the increased noise and pollution and (3) committed the standing portion of their brief to a discussion of the Board's structure and how it implicated causation and redressability. See id. at 20-23. In addition, most of the (few) Circuit cases discussing CAAN reference the increased noise as the injury
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedOrdinarily, if a for-profit is able to make out this showing, it will have also suffered economic injury and standing will be certain. This category, then, is chiefly implicated (and most relevant) for non-profits
no DOI — not checkedBut non-profits are ubiquitous in the mission advancement cases where economic injury is plainly not established. See generally Smith v
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.