Reference health
The Future Prospects of Energy Technologies: Insights from Expert Elicitations
98/98 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 98 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034020
The future costs of nuclear power using multiple expert elicitations: effects of RD&D and elicitation design
resolves10.1017/CBO9781107338890.002
Expanding and Better Targeting U.S. Investment in Energy Innovation: An Analytical Approach
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2815365
Finding Common Ground When Experts Disagree: Belief Dominance Over Portfolios of Alternatives
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1407048
Advanced Nuclear Power: Combining Economic Analysis with Expert Elicitations to Inform Climate Policy
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2007.10.008
Advanced solar R&D: Combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy
resolves10.1007/s10584-009-9634-y
Carbon capture and storage: combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2010.02.005
Battery technology for electric and hybrid vehicles: Expert views about prospects for advancement
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.008
Future costs of key low-carbon energy technologies: Harmonization and aggregation of energy technology expert elicitation data
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0067864
Determinants of the Pace of Global Innovation in Energy Technologies
resolves10.1287/deca.1070.0089
Some Comparisons among Quadratic, Spherical, and Logarithmic Scoring Rules
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2013.11.003
Energy technology expert elicitations: An application to natural gas turbine efficiencies
resolves10.1111/risa.12272
The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Good Things Come to Those Who Weight?
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.024
The future prospect of PV and CSP solar technologies: An expert elicitation survey
resolves10.1029/2011wr011212
Decision scaling: Linking bottom‐up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector
resolves10.2172/479072
Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.078
Going electric: Expert survey on the future of battery technologies for electric vehicles
resolves10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.169
Expert elicitation of cost, performance, and RD&D budgets for coal power with CCS
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.038
Expert assessments of retrofitting coal-fired power plants with carbon dioxide capture technologies
resolves10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00399.x
Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis
resolves10.1287/opre.33.2.427
Limits for the Precision and Value of Information from Dependent Sources
resolves10.1021/es0714078
A Probabilistic Characterization of the Relationship between Fine Particulate Matter and Mortality: Elicitation of European Experts
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033152
Procedures Guide for Structural Expert Judgement in Accident Consequence Modelling
resolves10.1111/risa.12353
The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Good Things Come to Those Who Weight?
resolves10.1093/reep/rev003
Reflections–Managing Uncertain Climates: Some Guidance for Policy Makers and Researchers
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.021
ExpertLens: A system for eliciting opinions from a large pool of non-collocated experts with diverse knowledge
resolves10.1016/0169-2070(94)02006-b
The use of probability elicitation in the high-level nuclear waste regulation program
resolves10.5547/2160-5890.4.1.lran
Revisiting the Cost Escalation Curse of Nuclear Power: New Lessons from the French Experience
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.061
Advanced biofuels: Future perspectives from an expert elicitation survey
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.015
The power of biomass: Experts disclose the potential for success of bioenergy technologies
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.049
Probabilistic decision model of wind power investment and influence of green power market
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.003
The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing
resolves10.1177/0272989x9901900315
Book Reviews : Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions. By JOHN S. HAMMOND, RALPH L. KEENEY, and HOWARD RAIFFA. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1999, 272 pages, hardcover: $22.50
resolves10.1016/s0040-1625(97)00075-9
Nuclear waste and future societies: A look into the deep future
resolves10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.07.003
Elicitator: An expert elicitation tool for regression in ecology
resolves10.1533/9781845699789.4.580
Assessment of expert judgments for safety analyses and performance assessment of geological repository systems
resolves10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.022
Expert elicitations of energy penalties for carbon capture technologies
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-6906
Agreeing on Robust Decisions: New Processes for Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.008
The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom
resolves10.2172/414310
Branch technical position on the use of expert elicitation in the high-level radioactive waste program
resolves10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00546.x
Elicitation of Expert Judgments of Uncertainty in the Risk Assessment of Herbicide‐Tolerant Oilseed Crops
resolves10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00940.x
Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses: Comparison of Robust, Optimum, and Precautionary Approaches
resolves10.1108/17465660910973961
The reliability of aggregated probability judgments obtained through Cooke's classical model
resolves10.1073/pnas.1319946111
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy
resolves10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.021
Robust optimization to secure urban bulk water supply against extreme drought and uncertain climate change
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.031
Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies
resolves10.1287/opre.37.5.689
OR Practice—Selecting a Portfolio of Environmental Programs for a Synthetic Fuels Facility
resolves10.1007/978-1-4615-5089-1_17
Group Elicitation of Probability Distributions: Are Many Heads Better Than One?
resolves10.1021/es0713882
Expert Judgment Assessment of the Mortality Impact of Changes in Ambient Fine Particulate Matter in the U.S.
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094008
The effect of natural gas supply on US renewable energy and CO<sub>2</sub>emissions
resolves10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01337.x
Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.110
An expert elicitation of climate, energy and economic uncertainties
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.006
The effects of expert selection, elicitation design, and R&D assumptions on experts' estimates of the future costs of photovoltaics
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00108-6
Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations
resolves10.1073/pnas.0908906107
Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.015
Missions-oriented RD&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States
resolves10.1017/cbo9781107338890.005
Maximizing the Benefit from International Cooperation in Energy Innovation
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.139
A model-based assessment of the impact of revitalised R&D investments on the European power sector
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.007
Bottom-up estimation of industrial and public R&D investment by technology in support of policy-making: The case of selected low-carbon energy technologies
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedPolicy for Energy Technology Innovation
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedThe Difficulty of Assessing Uncertainty
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedA Decade of Success
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedWorld Energy Outlook
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedThe Entrepreneurial State: debunking public vs. private sector myths
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedExpert Opinion on Climatic Change
no DOI — not checkedEnergy Research at DOE: Was it Worth it? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation of Potential Cost Reductions from Improved Amine-Based CO2 Capture Systems
no DOI — not checkedFrom Expert Elicitations to Integrated Assessment: Future Prospects of Carbon Capture Technologies
no DOI — not checkedA Web-Based Tool for Expert Elicitation in Distributed Teams
no DOI — not checkedref109
no DOI — not checkedTechnology Learning Curves for Energy Policy Support
no DOI — not checkedref116
no DOI — not checkedFrankfurt School of Finance & Management gGmbH
no DOI — not checkedref120
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2815367"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2815367/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2815367)