Reference health

An Efficiency Analysis of the ‘Three-Missions’ in Irish Higher Education Institutions

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2832715
CiteStamped reference-health badge
50/50 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

26 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 50 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1155/2014/427673
Estimation of Congestion in Free Disposal Hull Models Using Data Envelopment Analysis
resolves10.1016/s0272-7757(01)00068-1
The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.003
Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer
resolves10.1080/09645299700000011
Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the Means of Data Envelopment Analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.031
The pursuit of knowledge transfer activities: An efficiency analysis of Spanish universities
resolves10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_29
Knowledge Networks from Patent Data
resolves10.1080/10438590701709025
US universities’ net returns from patenting and licensing: a quantile regression analysis
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.016
Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis
resolves10.1007/s00191-002-0105-0
Technology transfer in United States universities
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.007
Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence
resolves10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.011
Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA
resolves10.1007/s11192-015-1561-2
Returns to scale of Business Administration research in Germany
resolves10.1093/cje/bes020
University technology transfer: how (in)efficient are French universities?
resolves10.1007/978-0-387-25534-7_16
Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00093-6
The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4
The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations
resolves10.2307/2343100
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency
resolves10.1080/15575330109489697
The Evolution of Knowledge Networks: An Example for Rural Development
resolves10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(200024)16:1<82::aid-agr7>3.0.co;2-v
Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production
resolves10.1023/A:1021674618658
University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?
resolves10.1002/jae.3950100106
Efficiency in the provision of university teaching and research: An empirical analysis of UK universities
resolves10.1080/09645299500000023
The Achievement of Scale Efficiency in UK Universities: A Multiple-input Multiple-output Analysis
resolves10.1007/s10961-013-9298-7
A new perspective to explore the technology transfer efficiencies in US universities
resolves10.4324/9780203940594
Competing for Knowledge
resolves10.1087/20100308
Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042095
MEASURING THE RESEARCH PERFORMANCE OF UK ECONOMICS DEPARTMENTS: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
resolves10.1016/j.omega.2006.02.003
Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study☆
resolves10.1162/154247604323067961
Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities
resolves10.1080/1351847042000254211
Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university–industry technology transfer
resolves10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
On the mechanics of economic development
resolves10.1080/09645299700000013
Measuring Public Sector Efficiency: A Study of Economics Departments at Australian Universities
resolves10.2307/3552021
The Relative Efficiencies of Canadian Universities: A DEA Perspective
resolves10.2307/2525757
Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00100-6
The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980
resolves10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001
The Knowledge-Creating Company
resolves10.1086/261420
Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth
resolves10.1023/A:1021622501820
New Approaches to Technology Transfer from Publicly Funded Research
resolves10.1177/000312240507000602
The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00196-2
Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study
resolves10.1080/10438590701785769
ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN THE US AND UK: A STOCHASTIC DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH
resolves10.2307/1884513
A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00160-8
Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00066.x
AN EXPERIMENT IN THE USE OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS FOR EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF UK UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS OF ACCOUNTING
resolves10.1007/bf01073473
On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science
resolves10.1596/978-1-4648-0440-3
World Development Indicators 2015
resolves10.1080/03075079.2015.1111324
The economic impact of higher education institutions in Ireland: evidence from disaggregated input–output tables
The 26 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedref73
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2832715"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2832715/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2832715/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2832715)