Reference health
Taring All Investors with the Same Brush? Evidence for Heterogeneity in Individual Preferences from a Maximum Likelihood Approach
4 of 332 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
59 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/1468-0297.00208
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.07.001
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2328253
does not resolve to a known work10.1142/9789812385451
The 328 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497.12080
Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0388
Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6288.1990.tb00793.x
Institutional Ownership and Distribution of Equity Returns
resolves10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
resolves10.1093/biomet/71.1.1
On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models
resolves10.2307/1907921
Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine
resolves10.1080/00401706.1979.10489724
Logistic Discrimination and Bias Correction in Maximum Likelihood Estimation
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2009.09.006
Preference heterogeneity in experiments: Comparing the field and laboratory
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.04.005
Trading imbalances, predictable reversals, and cross-stock price pressure
resolves10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.490
On the social psychology of the stock market: Aggregate attributional effects and the regressiveness of prediction.
resolves10.1016/0749-5978(88)90035-0
Explaining the price-volume relationship: The difference between price changes and changing prices
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00226
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm079
All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(02)00217-7
Are individual investors tax savvy? Evidence from retail and discount brokerage accounts
resolves10.1257/aer.98.5.2066
Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices
resolves10.1016/j.jedc.2009.01.009
Preferences with frames: A new utility specification that allows for the framing of risks
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00355
How Distance, Language, and Culture Influence Stockholdings and Trades
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01448.x
What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long‐Standing Preference‐Based Explanation
resolves10.3386/w5213
Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Survey
resolves10.1162/003355397555280
Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study
resolves10.3905/jod.2011.2011.1.012
The Pricing of Path-Dependent Structured Financial Retail Products:<i>The Case of Bonus Certificates</i>
resolves10.1006/obhd.1998.2816
Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity
resolves10.2307/2235514
Efficiency, Risk Aversion and Portfolio Insurance: An Analysis of Financial Asset Portfolios Held by Investors in the United Kingdom
resolves10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086
A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis
resolves10.1023/A:1015687502895
Testing Theories of Choice Under Risk: Estimation of Individual Functionals
resolves10.2307/2978737
The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for Utility Functions
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.004
A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory
resolves10.1007/s11238-009-9144-4
A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population
resolves10.1006/jmps.1999.1277
Akaike's Information Criterion and Recent Developments in Information Complexity
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1956777
Risk Aversion vs. Individualism: What Drives Risk Taking in Household Finance?
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2443.2007.00059.x
The Reach of the Disposition Effect: Large Sample Evidence Across Investor Classes<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1415975
Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion
resolves10.1257/aer.98.3.713
Do Wealth Fluctuations Generate Time-Varying Risk Aversion? Micro-Evidence on Individuals' Asset Allocation
resolves10.1016/s0167-9473(01)00048-2
A modified score function estimator for multinomial logistic regression in small samples
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.301
Fight Or Flight? Portfolio Rebalancing by Individual Investors<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1016/s0165-1765(97)00244-9
Investigation of stochastic preference theory using experimental data
resolves10.1007/bf01064043
Discriminating between preference functionals: A preliminary Monte Carlo study
resolves10.2307/2676208
The Value of Active Mutual Fund Management: An Examination of the Stockholdings and Trades of Fund Managers
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb02534.x
Can Tax‐Loss Selling Explain the January Seasonal in Stock Returns?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2255674
Looking for Someone to Blame: Delegation, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Disposition Effect
resolves10.1002/bdm.561
Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors
resolves10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00057.x
Asymmetric information in insurance: general testable implications
resolves10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01046.x
RELATIVE RISK AVERSION IS CONSTANT: EVIDENCE FROM PANEL DATA
resolves10.1207/s15327760jpfm0204_6
An Experimental Study of the Disposition Effect: Evidence From Macau
resolves10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00229-5
Who underreacts to cash-flow news? evidence from trading between individuals and institutions
resolves10.3386/w1176
Optimal Stock Trading with Personal Taxes: Implications for Prices and the Abnormal January Returns
resolves10.1080/00031305.1990.10475751
A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02724.x
Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic‐Based Benchmarks
resolves10.1016/0169-2070(93)90030-q
Betting on trends: Intuitive forecasts of financial risk and return
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1040.0473
Up Close and Personal: Investor Sophistication and the Disposition Effect
resolves10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES
resolves10.1016/s0167-4870(99)00027-6
Subjective measures of household preferences and financial decisions
resolves10.2307/145996
The Specification and Estimation of Dynamic Stochastic Discrete Choice Models: A Survey
resolves10.1155/2010/302895
Segregation and Integration: A Study of the Behaviors of Investors with Extended Value Functions
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2189913
The Performance of Individual Investors in Structured Financial Products
resolves10.1007/s10679-005-2262-0
Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets?
resolves10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199703)10:1<53::aid-bdm245>3.0.co;2-1
Original and cumulative prospect theory: a discussion of empirical differences
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04599.x
Predicting Contemporary Volume with Historic Volume at Differential Price Levels: Evidence Supporting the Disposition Effect
resolves10.1162/003355301753265561
Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence from the Housing Market
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00873.x
Do Dividend Clienteles Exist? Evidence on Dividend Preferences of Retail Investors
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1431
Initial Public Offerings as Lotteries: Skewness Preference and First-Day Returns
resolves10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00044-6
The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: a study of Finland's unique data set
resolves10.1086/296593
Performance Measurement without Benchmarks: An Examination of Mutual Fund Returns
resolves10.1023/A:1016316725855
Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses
resolves10.1007/s10683-008-9203-7
Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1100.1269
Portfolio Choice Under Cumulative Prospect Theory: An Analytical Treatment
resolves10.1002/sim.2687
A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data
resolves10.2307/252685
Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses: An Expected Utility Analysis
resolves10.1016/0014-2921(09)40007-4
Experimental investigations of errors in decision making under risk
resolves10.1016/0165-1765(94)00533-8
Stochastic choice with deterministic preferences: An experimental investigation
resolves10.2307/2951750
Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
resolves10.1287/trsc.16.3.382
An Investigation of the Accuracy of the Clark Approximation for the Multinomial Probit Model
resolves10.4236/jmf.2012.21013
A Skewness-Adjusted Binomial Model for Pricing Futures Options—The Importance of the Mean and Carrying-Cost Parameters
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(78)90039-9
Subjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model
resolves10.1016/j.finmar.2003.11.002
Market-wide impact of the disposition effect: evidence from IPO trading volume
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhs090
Do Investors Buy What They Know? Product Market Choices and Investment Decisions
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01015.x
Can Mutual Fund “Stars” Really Pick Stocks? New Evidence from a Bootstrap Analysis
resolves10.1016/j.finmar.2007.06.003
Do the diversification choices of individual investors influence stock returns?
resolves10.1017/s0022109009990020
Dynamic Style Preferences of Individual Investors and Stock Returns
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04559.x
Volume for Winners and Losers: Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading
resolves10.1086/505243
Do Investors Integrate Losses and Segregate Gains? Mental Accounting and Investor Trading Decisions*
resolves10.1016/s0191-2615(99)00033-8
Global maximum likelihood estimation procedure for multinomial probit (MNP) model parameters
resolves10.1023/A:1014094209265
A Microeconometric Test of Alternative Stochastic Theories of Risky Choice
resolves10.1080/00401706.1980.10486214
A Note on Bias Correction in Maximum likelihood Estimation With logistic Discrimination
resolves10.1207/s15427579jpfm0404_6
Regression to the Mean: One of the Most Neglected but Important Concepts in the Stock Market
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2004.05.029
Dynamic decision making without expected utility: An operational approach
resolves10.1080/1351847x.2011.601635
A detailed investigation of the disposition effect and individual trading behavior: a panel survival approach
resolves10.1016/s1042-4431(03)00020-9
Coexistence of disposition investors and momentum traders in stock markets: experimental evidence
resolves10.1017/s0266466600009178
On the Use of Artificial Regressions in Certain Microeconometric Models
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhi033
Household Portfolio Diversification: A Case for Rank-Dependent Preferences
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00328
Capital Gains Tax Rules, Tax‐loss Trading, and Turn‐of‐the‐year Returns
resolves10.2307/2531435
A Consensus Combined P-Value Test and the Family-Wide Significance of Component Tests
resolves10.2307/1243978
Expo‐Power Utility: A ‘Flexible’ Form for Absolute and Relative Risk Aversion
resolves10.2307/1243619
Joint Estimation of Risk Preference Structure and Technology Using Expo‐Power Utility
resolves10.1093/biomet/73.3.755
A note on A. Albert and J. A. Anderson's conditions for the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models
resolves10.1214/aoms/1177728170
Contributions to the Theory of Rank Order Statistics-the Two-Sample Case
resolves10.1086/295998
Realized Returns on Common Stock Investments: The Experience of Individual Investors
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1975.tb01834.x
INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR RISK AVERSION AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb04859.x
THE COMMON‐STOCK‐PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE RECORD OF INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS: 1964–70
resolves10.1016/s0378-4266(00)00139-4
Patterns of behavior of professionally managed and independent investors
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x
The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.3386/w0456
Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03886.x
Marketmaker Behavior in an Auction Market: An Analysis of Scalpers in Futures Markets
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2845866
Taring All Investors with the Same Brush? Evidence for Heterogeneity in Individual Preferences from a Maximum Likelihood Approach
resolves10.1023/a:1026384519480
Weber's Law and the Biological Evolution of Risk Preferences: The Selective Dominance of the Logarithmic Utility Function, 2002 Geneva Risk Lecture
resolves10.1257/jel.38.2.332
Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
resolves10.1080/03610927808827599
Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections
resolves10.1162/003355397555226
The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test
resolves10.1287/mnsc.49.7.979.16383
The Data of Levy and Levy (2002) “Prospect Theory: Much Ado About Nothing?” Actually Support Prospect Theory
resolves10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1131
Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown
resolves10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00089-9
The disposition effect in securities trading: an experimental analysis
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00263
Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock‐Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses
resolves10.1016/S0193-2306(08)00004-5
Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: a critical primer and econometric comparison
resolves10.1007/s12197-008-9063-1
Are day traders bias free?—evidence from internet stock message boards
The 59 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedInformation measures and model selection
no DOI — not checkedQualitative response models
no DOI — not checkedstate specific changes in consumption instead of changes in wealth enter the functional u SP T (Wt, W RP |? SP T ) (also Barberis and Xiong (2009)) such that a direct comparison of the results drawn in those papers to implications of equation(B.3) is necessarily flawed to some extend
no DOI — not checkedQualitative response models: A survey
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedDo individual day traders make money? evidence from taiwan
no DOI — not checkedOnce burned twice shy: Naive learning, counterfactuals and the repruchase of stocks previously sold
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedStatic portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory
no DOI — not checkedEstimation and inference in non-linear structural models
no DOI — not checkedExposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk; translation of bernoulli d. specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis; commentarii academiae scientiarum imperalis petropolitanae
no DOI — not checkedref86
no DOI — not checkedSubjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extention of the expected utility model
no DOI — not checkedA comparison of the estimates of eu and noneu preference functionals using data from pairwise choice and complete ranking experiments
no DOI — not checkedref133
no DOI — not checkedref135
no DOI — not checkedref141
no DOI — not checkedref143
no DOI — not checkedCombining independent tests of significance
no DOI — not checkedref159
no DOI — not checkedref169
no DOI — not checkedref171
no DOI — not checkedref176
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors
no DOI — not checkedExperimental evidence on alternative portfolio decision rules
no DOI — not checkedref180
no DOI — not checkedref183
no DOI — not checkedProspect theory, mental accounting, and the disposition effect
no DOI — not checkedref203
no DOI — not checkedLoss aversion in a futures market: An empirical test
no DOI — not checkedref221
no DOI — not checkedref222
no DOI — not checkedApplied Logistic Regression
no DOI — not checkedref231
no DOI — not checkedref242
no DOI — not checkedref251
no DOI — not checkedref253
no DOI — not checkedThe equity premium: Its still a puzzle
no DOI — not checkedExperimental tests of the separation theorem and the capital asset pricing model
no DOI — not checkedref264
no DOI — not checkedRisk aversion and incentive effects
no DOI — not checkedref284
no DOI — not checkedref285
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in this consideration
no DOI — not checkedref303
no DOI — not checkedref315
no DOI — not checkedThe rationality struggle: Illustrations from financial markets
no DOI — not checkedref325
no DOI — not checkedref328
no DOI — not checkedOrange juice and the weather
no DOI — not checkedref335
no DOI — not checkedref337
no DOI — not checkedref349
no DOI — not checkedref351
no DOI — not checkedref368
no DOI — not checkedDaily stock return volatility
no DOI — not checkedref377
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2845866"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2845866/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2845866)