Reference health

Can There Be a Burden of the Best Explanation?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2857034
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 74 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-29

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

42 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.521
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.62.2.189
The 72 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_17
Abductive Reasoning in Law: Taxonomy and Inference to the Best Explanation
resolves10.1093/mind/lxxxvii.1.22
Concepts of Evidence
resolves10.1093/pq/pqu034
A Defence of Epistemic Consequentialism
resolves10.1007/978-94-009-2931-9_2
A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials
resolves10.3366/e1742360008000427
Explanationism All the Way Down
resolves10.1093/lpr/mgu005
Burdens of proof
resolves10.2307/1073901
Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence
resolves10.1086/508269
The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3
The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments
resolves10.1007/bf01090049
Inference to the loveliest explanation
resolves10.1215/00318108-2087645
Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions
resolves10.1111/phis.12019
THE REJECTION OF EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM
resolves10.1017/epi.2015.3
REPLY TO GOLDMAN: CUTTING UP THE ONE TO SAVE THE FIVE IN EPISTEMOLOGY
resolves10.2307/1342258
Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy
resolves10.2307/797336
Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process
resolves10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3
On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the best explanation
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698370.001.0001
The Epistemology of Disagreement
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198244127.001.0001
The Probable and The Provable
resolves10.1093/mind/xcviii.391.367
Belief and Acceptance
resolves10.1007/978-94-017-2020-5_19
Should a Jury Say What it Believes or What it Accepts?
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198236047.003.0004
Does Knowledge Imply Belief or Acceptance?
resolves10.1023/a:1014693024962
Rethinking the probative value of evidence: Base rates, intuitive profiling, and the "postdiction" of behavior.
resolves10.1111/papa.12000
Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge
resolves10.2307/1339656
A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence
resolves10.1177/1365712797001special02
Answering the Bayesioskeptical Challenge
resolves10.2307/1073911
"E" Is for Eclectic: Multiple Perspectives on Evidence
resolves10.1086/288959
Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation
resolves10.2307/1522860
Skepticism and Reasoning to the Best Explanation
resolves10.1017/epi.2015.25
RELIABILISM, VERITISM, AND EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511801297
An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic
resolves10.2307/2183532
The Inference to the Best Explanation
resolves10.1093/mind/liv.213.1
I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (I.)
resolves10.1093/mind/liv.214.97
I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (II.)
resolves10.2307/785533
Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning
resolves10.2307/786270
Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning
resolves10.2307/1322028
The Path of the Law
resolves10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_15
On the Proof Dynamics of Inference to the Best Explanation
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
resolves10.2307/1227491
Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process
resolves10.1086/467927
The Value of Accuracy in Adjudication: An Economic Analysis
resolves10.1177/136571279900300101
Clarifying the Burden of Persuasion: What Bayesian Decision Rules Do and Do Not Do
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511617515
Truth, Error, and Criminal Law
resolves10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.292
Strange Bedfellows: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Criminal Standard of Proof
resolves10.2307/1288024
Modeling Relevance
resolves10.4324/9780203744857.ch21
Inference to the Best Explanation
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511779190.007
Locke: From <i>An Essay concerning Human Understanding</i> (4th edn, 1700)
resolves10.1017/cbo9781139149846
A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive
resolves10.2307/1073902
Naturalized Epistemology and the Critique of Evidence Theory
resolves10.1086/428020
Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence: An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Small Random‐Match Probability
resolves10.2307/1340444
Reasonable Doubt and Permissive Inferences: The Value of Complexity
resolves10.2307/1340951
The Evidence or the Event? On Judicial Proof and the Acceptability of Verdicts
resolves10.2307/j.ctt7rwk2
The Nature of Rationality
resolves10.1007/s10982-007-9016-4
Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511752896.010
The story model for juror decision making
resolves10.1016/0010-0277(93)90038-w
Reasoning in explanation-based decision making
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511625268
Mathematics, Matter and Method
resolves10.4324/9781315887814
Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays
resolves10.1093/lpr/2.4.275
Objective probability and the assessment of evidence
resolves10.1017/s1352325208080117
EXPLORING THE PROOF PARADOXES
resolves10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.286
Probability, Policy and the Problem of Reference Class
resolves10.1002/0470013397.ch14
Assessing Evidence: Proving Facts
resolves10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_16
Species of Abductive Reasoning in Fact Investigation in Law
resolves10.1093/lpr/mgt010
Bridging the gap between Bayesian and story-comparison models of juridical inference
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257363.001.0001
Foundations of Evidence Law
resolves10.2307/2025686
The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice
resolves10.2307/1191633
Liability and Individualized Evidence
resolves10.2307/1339610
Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process
resolves10.1093/0198244274.001.0001
The Scientific Image
resolves10.5962/bhl.title.19044
The logic of chance; an essay on the foundations and province of the theory of probability, with especial reference to its logical bearings and its application to moral and social science, and to statistics
resolves10.5840/jphil1990871123
Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2562563
Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: A Balanced Retributive Account
resolves10.2307/1120774
Some Difficulties in Devising Rules for Determining Truth in Judicial Trials
The 42 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe nature of juridicial proof
no DOI — not checkedFactual ambiguity and a theory of evidence
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedInference to the best legal explanation
no DOI — not checkedAn essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedSubjective probability and the paradox of the gatecrasher
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedIn re gault and the future of juvenile law
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedProbabilistic standards of proof, their complements and the errors that are expected to flow from them
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedThe paradox of the gatecrasher and other stories
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedExplanatory unification and the causal structure of the world
no DOI — not checkedVeridical verdicts: Increasing verdict accuracy through the use of overtly probabilistic evidence and methods
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedThe nature and purpose of evidence theory
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedA cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedref93
no DOI — not checkedref96
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedref99
no DOI — not checkedAre people probabilistically challenged?
no DOI — not checkedref103
no DOI — not checkedref106
no DOI — not checkedExplanation as a guide to induction
no DOI — not checkedref114
no DOI — not checkedref115
no DOI — not checkedVanishing trials, vanishing juries, vanishing constitution
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2857034"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2857034/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2857034/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2857034)