Reference health

Giving in the Face of Risk

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2863967
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 40 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-05

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

2 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01669774
The 39 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x
Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2763318
When Fair Isn't Fair: Sophisticated Time Inconsistency in Social Preferences
resolves10.1007/s10683-007-9172-2
Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?
resolves10.1257/aer.90.1.166
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01032.x
Fair Procedures: Evidence from Games Involving Lotteries
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2006.07.006
Is generosity involuntary?
resolves10.1257/aer.103.1.415
Dictating the Risk: Experimental Evidence on Giving in Risky Environments
resolves10.1257/aer.97.3.818
The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach
resolves10.1257/aer.103.4.1398
Just Luck: An Experimental Study of Risk-Taking and Fairness
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2016.2535
Justice Under Uncertainty
resolves10.1257/00028280260344740
Hardnose the Dictator
resolves10.1257/jel.47.2.448
Gender Differences in Preferences
resolves10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z
Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2198
Ambiguity Attitudes in a Large Representative Sample
resolves10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES
resolves10.1023/A:1011109625844
Estimating Risk Attitudes using Lotteries: A Large Sample Approach
resolves10.2307/1884324
Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
resolves10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
Dictator games: a meta study
resolves10.1162/003355399556151
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
resolves10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
resolves10.1006/game.1994.1021
Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.004
Fairness, risk preferences and independence: Impossibility theorems
resolves10.1257/aer.102.1.469
A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2009.08.002
Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior
resolves10.1257/000282802762024700
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
resolves10.2307/1914185
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
resolves10.2307/2937956
Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.003
A glimpse through the veil of ignorance: Equality of opportunity and support for redistribution
resolves10.1007/s10683-010-9253-5
‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk
resolves10.1007/s11238-009-9189-4
A model of procedural and distributive fairness
resolves10.1086/519249
On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(85)90020-4
The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests
resolves10.1007/s00199-005-0643-4
Axiomatic reference-dependence in behavior toward others and toward risk
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00158
Risk Aversion and Expected-utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem
resolves10.1007/s11166-015-9224-5
Managing social risks – tradeoffs between risks and inequalities
resolves10.1257/aer.103.7.3084
Social Preferences under Risk: Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Outcome
resolves10.1017/S1930297500005593
A method to elicit beliefs as most likely intervals
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2009.07.002
A tractable model of process fairness under risk
resolves10.1257/aer.101.2.664
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population
The 2 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedA model of reference-dependent preferences
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-05 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2863967"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2863967/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2863967/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2863967)