Reference health
Contracts and Automation: Exploring the Normativity of Automation in the Context of U.S. Contract Law and E.U. Consumer Protection Directives
8/8 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
34 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 8 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198728733.003.0018
Reassessing Assent-based Critiques of Adhesion Contracts
resolves10.2307/3312639
Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms
resolves10.2307/1290478
Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation through Rules, Norms, and Institutions
The 34 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedToward a fairer model of consumer assent to standard form contracts: In defense of Restatement subsection
no DOI — not checkedPropertization metaphors for bargaining power and control of the self in the information age
no DOI — not checkedBargaining power in the shadow of the law: Commentary to professors Wright and Engen, professor Birke, and Josh Bowers
no DOI — not checkedContext as power: defining the field of battle for advantage in contractual relations
no DOI — not checkedEscaping toxic contracts: How we have lost the war on assent in wrap contracts
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedThe uncertainty of U.C.C. section 2-302: Why unconscionability has become a relic
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedUnconscionability and the Uniform Commercial Code
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedThe cost of consent: Optimal standardization in the law of contract
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedHumans, computers, and binding commitment
no DOI — not checkedEmbracing unconscionability's safety net function
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedThe death of contracts
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedUnconscionable quandary: U.C.C. article 2 and the unconscionability doctrine
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2878162"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2878162/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2878162)