Reference health
Disaggregating the Matching Function
43/43 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 43 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00518
The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: the Aggregate Evidence
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.09.008
The extent and cyclicality of career changes: Evidence for the U.K.
resolves10.1016/s0927-5371(97)00018-3
Gross flows vs. net flows in the labor market: What is there to be learned?
resolves10.1257/jep.26.3.3
A Search and Matching Approach to Labor Markets: Did the Natural Rate of Unemployment Rise?
resolves10.1257/jep.20.3.3
The Flow Approach to Labor Markets: New Data Sources and Micro–Macro Links
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040791
THE EXCESS DEMAND FOR LABOUR A STUDY OF CONDITIONS IN GREAT BRITAIN, 1946–56
1
resolves10.2139/ssrn.594824
Employer-to-Employer Flows in the U.S. Labor Market: The Complete Picture of Gross Worker Flows
resolves10.1080/000368496327723
Employers' recruitment behaviour and vacancy duration: an empirical analysis for the Dutch labour market
resolves10.1257/mac.4.4.56
Evidence on the Incidence of Wage Posting, Wage Bargaining, and On-the-Job Search
resolves10.1080/00036840412331313530
Returns to scale in a matching model: evidence from disaggregated panel data
resolves10.1086/673374
Does Online Search Crowd Out Traditional Search and Improve Matching Efficiency? Evidence from Craigslist
resolves10.1017/s1365100509080122
LABOR TURNOVER COSTS AND THE CYCLICAL BEHAVIOR OF VACANCIES AND UNEMPLOYMENT
resolves10.2307/2946701
The Long Side of the Market and the Short End of the Stick: Bargaining Power and Price Formation in Buyers', Sellers', and Balanced Markets
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedEvaluating the Role of Labor Market Mismatch in Rising Unemployment
no DOI — not checkedLabor Market Heterogeneity and the Aggregate Matching Function
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedThe Recent Evolution of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
no DOI — not checkedLabor Market Flows in the Cross Section and Over Time
no DOI — not checkedPotential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance
no DOI — not checkedThe Nature and Sources of Unemployment in the United States
no DOI — not checkedWhat the Federal Reserve Is Doing to Promote a Stronger Job Market
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedThe Technological Unemployment and Structural Unemployment Debates
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkednonparticipation-to-employment (NE) and jobto-job (EE) flows computed using CPS data) do not line up with the hires measured from the employers' perspective, especially in levels. 34 Moreover, while UE and NE flows can be computed from the CPS micro data starting in 1976 and are readily available, a monthly measure of job-to-job flows is only available after the CPS redesign in 1994. 35 To obtain a JOLTS-type measure of hires going back to 1976, we first use the methodology developed in Blanchard and Diamond (1990) and construct annual job-to-job transition measures using the Annual Social and Economic (ASEC) Supplement of the CPS (also known as March Supplements). We then use linear interpolation to create quarterly measures of job-to-job transitions. We find that, while the levels of job-to-job transition measures we obtain are lower than the ones computed using the basic monthly files for 1994-2010, they follow a very similar cyclical pattern. With the quarterly estimates of the job-to-job transitions in hand, we regress JOLTS hires on UE, NE, and job-to-job (EE) flows for
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref62
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2884984"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2884984/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2884984)