Reference health

The Power of Active Choice: Field Experimental Evidence on Repeated Contribution Decisions to a Carbon Offsetting Program

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2896741
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 22 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1509/0743-9156-32.2.159
The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2769934
Online Fundraising, Self-Deception, and the Long-Term Impact of Ask Avoidance
resolves10.3386/w17648
Avoiding The Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving
resolves10.1007/s10640-012-9615-x
Can Defaults Save the Climate? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Carbon Offsetting Programs
resolves10.1145/359205.359241
On site: to opt-in or opt-out?
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226801.003.0004
Chapter 3 The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Saving Outcomes: Evidence from the USA
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1639
Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1142/s2010007810000091
EXPLAINING THE PRICE OF VOLUNTARY CARBON OFFSETS
resolves10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z
Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
resolves10.1093/qje/qjr050
Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving
resolves10.1037/a0024354
Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose.
resolves10.1515/9783110838336-002
1. Wesen und Ziele integrierter Systeme
resolves10.1126/science.1091721
Do Defaults Save Lives?
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.01.004
The long-term impact of matching and rebate subsidies when public goods are impure: Field experimental evidence from the carbon offsetting market
resolves10.1093/reep/rew008
The Use of Field Experiments in Environmental and Resource Economics
resolves10.3386/w21875
Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experimental Economics
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2011.06.002
Are experienced people affected by a pre-set default option—Results from a field experiment
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01721.x
Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004
Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour
resolves10.1111/kykl.12028
Green by Default
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2377364
Choosing Not to Choose
resolves10.1007/s40881-015-0006-2
Fair weather avoidance: unpacking the costs and benefits of “Avoiding the Ask”
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref24
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2896741"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2896741/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2896741/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2896741)