Reference health

Interpreting Contracts via Surveys and Experiments

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2905873
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 17 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-05

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

47 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.5040/9781580819015.01
The 16 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/1123389
The Inverted Hierarchy of Contract Interpretation and Supplementation
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1725467
Interpretive Risk and Contract Interpretation: A Suggested Approach for Maximizing Value
resolves10.2172/5284229
Pu-238 fuel form activities, January 1-31, 1983
resolves10.2139/ssrn.167970
The Tentative Case Against Flexibility in Commercial Law
resolves10.2307/3312625
The Parol Evidence Rule, the Plain Meaning Rule, and the Principles of Contractual Interpretation
resolves10.5962/bhl.title.153780
Nevada rangeland phenology /
resolves10.21236/ada217167
NYU (New York University) Ultracomputer
resolves10.1038/scientificamerican03011887-59ebuild
Dwelling at Detroit, Mich
resolves10.1002/9781119209737.app5
Contact Information for Kase and Company, Inc.
resolves10.2307/1112736
Admissibility of Local Usage Which Is Unknown to the Other Contracting Party
resolves10.1093/benz/9780199773787.article.b00190901
Vierthaler, Michael or Johann Michael
resolves10.1305/ndjfl/1093957237
A decision procedure for positive implication.
resolves10.2307/1065847
Juries. Refusal to Set Aside Verdict in a Civil Case Because of Relationship of Juror to Defendant within the Discretion of the Trial Court
resolves10.2307/1331640
Trial. Instructions. Implying Jury Misconduct to Hold an Erroneous Instruction Unfavorable
The 47 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedInterpretation and Implied Terms in Contract Law
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedVictoria's Secret Stores Brand Mgmt
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkeddemonstrating that it may be optimal not to enforce the "literal" (plain) meaning of a term
no DOI — not checkedInsurance, Contract, and the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations, 5 CONN
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedat 93 (arguing that without a "social scientific survey . . . it is unclear how the general subjective understanding of transactors across a relevant market could be reliably established
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedIf You (Re)Build It, They Will Come: Contracts to Remake the Rules of Litigation in Arbitration's Image, 30 HARV
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedWhither Bespoke Procedure?
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedSince consumers do not scrutinize such terms in the contract, this risk is real and could undermine the integrity of the survey interpretation method. A similar phenomenon became widespread in consumer credit contracts, when firms included arbitration clauses that assigned dispute resolution jurisdictions to biased arbitrators. See Dan Slater, San Francisco Sues Provider of Arbitrators, Alleging Bias
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedActual Expectations of Privacy, Fourth Amendment Doctrine, and Mosaic Theory
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checked2014) (insisting that jurors would appreciate the significance behind the choice of "must" in the first clause and "should" in the second clause-notably, that juries have the power to nullify criminal convictions-when told
no DOI — not checkedproposing a larger role for lay juries in statutory interpretation matters); see also J.P. Sevilla, Measuring Ordinary Meaning Using Surveys
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-05 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2905873"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2905873/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2905873/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2905873)