Reference health
What to Buy When Forum Shopping? Analyzing Court Selection in Patent Litigation
22/22 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 22 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1086/597561
The Economics of a Centralized Judiciary: Uniformity, Forum Shopping, and the Federal Circuit
resolves10.3386/w7552
Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2016.08.005
Invalid but infringed? An analysis of the bifurcated patent litigation system
resolves10.1093/jiplp/jpr167
Speedy patent infringement proceedings in Germany: pros and cons of the go-to courts
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2835799
Predictably Expensive: A Critical Look at Patent Litigation in the Eastern District of Texas
resolves10.1177/1536867x1101100107
Stata Utilities for Geocoding and Generating Travel Time and Travel Distance Information
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.003
On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed”
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedVerletzungsgerichtsbarkeit zentral f�r jedes Patentsystem und doch h�ufig untersch�tzt
no DOI — not checkedIntellectual Property Litigation under the Civil Law Legal System: Experience in Germany
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedLicensing "Weak
no DOI — not checkedDamages Control: Returning Royalties to their Reasonable Roots
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedIs There a Patent Troll Problem in the UK? Fordham Intellectual Property
no DOI — not checkedJudicial Experience and the Efficiency and Accuracy of Patent Adjudication: An Empirical Analysis of the Case for a Specialized Patent Trial Court
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checked). translated by Frank Peterreins
no DOI — not checkedShopping for Reversals: How Accuracy Differs across Patent Litigation Forums
no DOI — not checkedForum Selection in Patent Litigation: A Traffic Report
no DOI — not checkedAre District Court Judges Equipped to Resolve Patent Cases?
no DOI — not checkedForum Shopping in Patent Cases: Does Geographic Choice Affect Innovation?
no DOI — not checkedLG M�nchen I macht Lizenzanalogie attraktiver
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedAdjudicatory Jurisdiction: General Theories Compared and Evaluated
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2931351"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2931351/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2931351)