Reference health
Periodicity in Parliamentary Budget Offices: The Case of New South Wales
2 of 16 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-29
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/budget-14-5jrw6591frbw
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/budget-15-5jm2795tv625
The 14 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2885639
Emergent Interdisciplinarity in Studying Legislative Budget Offices: Evidence from 2016
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2802169
The Parliamentary Budget Office and Parliamentary Oversight of the Extractive Industries in South Africa
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2887481
An 'Unpresidented' [Sic] Era of Budgeting: The Relationship between the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Post-2016
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2883720
Preventing Water Scarcity: The Role of Parliaments and of Parliamentary Budget Offices
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2883550
Independent Fiscal Institutions at the Supranational Level: The European Fiscal Board
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2923780
Is a Legislative Budget Office Compatible with the Nostrums of an 'Alternative-Facts' and Post-Truth Era?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2923703
‘I Inherited a Mess’: Evidence from Legislative Budget Office Fiscal Projections at the Beginning of the Trump Era
resolves10.5185/amlett.2019.2050
Low temperature processed efficient and stable perovskite solar cell
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedFostering a Community of Practice among Parliamentary Budget Offices of the Commonwealth
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedLegislative Budget Offices: Applying a Public Value Perspective to Parliamentary Fiscal Scrutiny
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedWhat is a Charter of Budget Honest? The Case of Australia
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedIndependent review of Parliamentary Budget Office
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedParliament of New South Wales
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2946102"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2946102/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2946102)