Reference health

The Identification of Attitudes towards Ambiguity and Risk from Asset Demand

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2954664
CiteStamped reference-health badge
34/34 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-07

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 34 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3982/qe243
Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment
resolves10.1162/154247603322256774
A Quartet of Semigroups for Model Specification, Robustness, Prices of Risk, and Model Detection
resolves10.1214/aoms/1177704255
A Definition of Subjective Probability
resolves10.1007/s11238-013-9406-z
Eliciting ambiguity aversion in unknown and in compound lotteries: a smooth ambiguity model experimental study
resolves10.1007/bf00122575
Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
resolves10.2307/1913607
Revealed Preferences and Differentiable Demand
resolves10.1257/aer.97.5.1921
Consistency and Heterogeneity of Individual Behavior under Uncertainty
resolves10.2307/2648752
Recovering Additive Utility Functions
resolves10.2307/2297128
Recovering Cardinal Utility
resolves10.3982/ecta12273
Savage in the Market
resolves10.2307/1884324
Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
resolves10.3982/ecta8689
A Paradox for the ''Smooth Ambiguity'' Model of Preference
resolves10.1016/0304-4068(90)90040-g
Observability and optimality
resolves10.4324/9780203358061_chapter_3
Defining ambiguity and ambiguity attitude
resolves10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9
Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
resolves10.1093/restud/rdr013
Portfolio Choices and Asset Prices: The Comparative Statics of Ambiguity Aversion
resolves10.1016/b978-0-12-298750-2.50014-9
Identifiability of the von Neumann–Morgenstern Utility Function from Asset Demands
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00755.x
Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00640.x
A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity
resolves10.3982/ecta9775
On the Smooth Ambiguity Model: A Reply
resolves10.3982/ecta13880
The Identification of Beliefs From Asset Demand
resolves10.1257/aer.104.11.3459
Asset Demand Based Tests of Expected Utility Maximization
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2925349
Integrability of Demand in Incomplete Markets: Kreps-Porteus-Selden Preferences
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00716.x
Ambiguity Aversion, Robustness, and the Variational Representation of Preferences
resolves10.2307/1912308
The Recoverability of Consumers' Preferences from Market Demand Behavior
resolves10.2307/2297089
On Revealed Preference Analysis
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(91)90157-y
Testing strictly concave rationality
resolves10.1111/1467-937x.00194
Ambiguity Aversion and Incompleteness of Financial Markets
resolves10.1016/0304-4068(83)90028-9
Observable probabilistic beliefs
resolves10.2307/2938207
Two-Stage Lotteries without the Reduction Axiom
resolves10.3982/ecta6727
Ambiguity and Second-Order Belief
resolves10.2307/2296957
Non-Parametric Tests of Consumer Behaviour
resolves10.2307/2330718
Nonparametric Tests of Models of Investor Behavior
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(69)90036-2
Some remarks on measures of risk aversion and on their uses
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedfurther differentiating equation (D.2) with respect to y j , and evaluating the resultant equation at the portfolio (y 1 , 0
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref38
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2954664"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2954664/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2954664/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2954664)