Reference health

Strategy-Proof Multi-Object Auction Design: Ex-Post Revenue Maximization with No Wastage

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2968195
CiteStamped reference-health badge
64/64 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-10

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 64 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s00355-013-0752-0
Equity and the Vickrey allocation rule on general preference domains
resolves10.1016/0899-8256(90)90017-o
The core of the matching game
resolves10.3982/ecta10893
Non-Manipulable House Allocation With Rent Control
resolves10.2307/2171924
Multiproduct Nonlinear Pricing
resolves10.1111/1467-937x.00139
Optimal Multi-Object Auctions
resolves10.1257/jel.41.3.763
Auctions and the Price of Art
resolves10.1007/s00355-011-0535-4
Characterizing Vickrey allocation rule by anonymity
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-1985
The Optimality of Being Efficient: Designing Auctions
resolves10.2202/1534-5955.1019
Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding
resolves10.3982/te1951
Auction design without quasilinear preferences
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2824921
Efficient Multi-Unit Auctions for Normal Goods
resolves10.2307/2951697
Strategy-Proof Exchange
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00695.x
Weak Monotonicity Characterizes Deterministic Dominant-Strategy Implementation
resolves10.7551/mitpress/9780262033428.003.0009
From the Assignment Model to Combinatorial Auctions
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00020
The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licences
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511800481.013
Combinatorial Auctions
resolves10.1137/1.9781611973075.49
Pricing Randomized Allocations
resolves10.3386/w4608
Auctions vs. Negotiations
resolves10.1109/focs.2012.88
Optimal Multi-dimensional Mechanism Design: Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization
resolves10.3982/ecta14165
Robustness and Separation in Multidimensional Screening
resolves10.1145/1806689.1806733
Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2012.08.010
The power of randomness in Bayesian optimal mechanism design
resolves10.1145/1807342.1807366
The power of randomness in bayesian optimal mechanism design
resolves10.3982/ecta12618
Strong Duality for a Multiple-Good Monopolist
resolves10.1257/mic.20150121
Discrimination via Symmetric Auctions
resolves10.2307/1912658
The Strategy Structure of Two-Sided Matching Markets
resolves10.1086/261411
Multi-Item Auctions
resolves10.3982/ecta10592
On the Equivalence of Bayesian and Dominant Strategy Implementation
resolves10.1006/jeth.1999.2531
Walrasian Equilibrium with Gross Substitutes
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2019.07.006
Selling multiple correlated goods: Revenue maximization and menu-size complexity
resolves10.3982/te1517
Maximal revenue with multiple goods: Nonmonotonicity and other observations
resolves10.2307/1911954
Groves' Scheme on Restricted Domains
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2937929
Low Reserve Prices in Auctions
resolves10.1111/1756-2171.12085
On absolute auctions and secret reserve prices
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2982971
Mechanism Design Without Quasilinearity
resolves10.1007/s00355-016-0986-8
Efficiency and strategy-proofness in object assignment problems with multi-demand preferences
resolves10.1257/0895330027166
What Really Matters in Auction Design
resolves10.1016/b978-012426297-3.50035-7
Efficiency and the English auction
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00233
Convex Potentials with an Application to Mechanism Design
resolves10.2139/ssrn.64934
Efficient Mechanism Design
resolves10.1086/261158
Elicitation of Honest Preferences for the Assignment of Individuals to Positions
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2005.08.007
Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2006.12.007
Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly
resolves10.3982/ecta8025
Bayesian and Dominant-Strategy Implementation in the Independent Private-Values Model
resolves10.1257/jep.10.1.159
Analyzing the Airwaves Auction
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00296
Envelope Theorems for Arbitrary Choice Sets
resolves10.3982/te1470
Strategy-proofness and efficiency with non-quasi-linear preferences: A characterization of minimum price Walrasian rule
resolves10.2307/2951537
Serial Cost Sharing
resolves10.1287/moor.6.1.58
Optimal Auction Design
resolves10.1016/0304-4068(87)90007-3
A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context
resolves10.2307/2999574
Ironing, Sweeping, and Multidimensional Screening
resolves10.1145/2229012.2229077
Supply-limiting mechanisms
resolves10.1007/s00199-007-0235-6
Vickrey allocation rule with income effect
resolves10.1007/s00199-007-0311-y
Second price auctions on general preference domains: two characterizations
resolves10.1111/j.1742-7363.2013.12018.x
Axiomatizations of second price auctions with a reserve price
resolves10.1007/s10058-012-0135-5
An equity characterization of second price auctions when preferences may not be quasilinear
resolves10.1007/bf01753437
The assignment game I: The core
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2015.04.007
Optimal auction design under non-commitment
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2012.09.015
Constrained-optimal strategy-proof assignment: Beyond the Groves mechanisms
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2003.09.002
Haggling over substitutes
resolves10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.01.005
On optimal mechanisms in the two-item single-buyer unit-demand setting
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(74)90075-1
Equity, envy, and efficiency
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511835216
Mechanism Design
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2017.12.019
Strategy-proofness and efficiency for non-quasi-linear and common-tiered-object preferences: Characterization of minimum price rule
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedThe competition complexity of auctions: A Bulow-Klemperer result for multidimensional bidders
no DOI — not checkedAuctions and bidding
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref66
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-10-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2968195"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2968195/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2968195/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2968195)