Reference health
Why Did Politicians Intervene in the Fair Value Debate? The Role of Ideology and Special Interests
41/41 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-16
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
32 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhv035
Valuing Changes in Political Networks: Evidence from Campaign Contributions to Close Congressional Elections
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.06.002
Panacea, Pandora's box, or placebo: Feedback in bank mortgage-backed security holdings and fair value accounting
resolves10.2308/acch.2007.21.1.1
Congressional Intervention in the Standard-Setting Process: An Analysis of the Stock Option Accounting Reform Act of 2004
resolves10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.433
The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Financial Reporting and Compensation: The Case of Employee Stock Options Expensing
resolves10.1111/ajps.12326
Making Washington Work: Legislative Entrepreneurship and the Personal Vote from the Gilded Age to the Great Depression
resolves10.1177/0312896213510713
The politics of accounting standard-setting: A review of empirical research
resolves10.3982/ecta16566
Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.002
How does the FASB make decisions? A descriptive study of agenda-setting and the role of individual board members
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.003
Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.003
The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.11.006
The implications of unverifiable fair-value accounting: Evidence from the political economy of goodwill accounting
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.07.003
The rise of deferred tax assets in Japan: The role of deferred tax accounting in the Japanese banking crisis
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00560.x
Biology, Ideology, and Epistemology: How Do We Know Political Attitudes Are Inherited and Why Should We Care?
resolves10.1086/340091
Can Special Interests Buy Congressional Votes? Evidence from Financial Services Legislation
resolves10.1017/s0022381607080164
Is There Truth in Advertising? Campaign Ad Images as Signals about Legislative Behavior
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.008
The role of stock ownership by US members of Congress on the market for political favors
resolves10.1093/rof/rfy015
The Personal Wealth Interests of Politicians and Government Intervention in the Economy
The 32 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedStock Options and Common Sense
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedHunter Again Opposes Massive Wall Street Bailout Bill
no DOI — not checkedCapture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedBill Would Have Them Counted as Expenses
no DOI — not checkedInterest-Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services' Political Action Committees
no DOI — not checkedBig Companies Get Low Marks for Lavish Executive Pay
no DOI — not checkedBattle Lines Drawn on Stock Options
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedHow Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedSenate Faces Stock-Option Issue in Accounting Bill
no DOI — not checkedWashington regulators debate fair value
no DOI — not checkedAn economic interpretation of the history of congressional voting in the twentieth century
no DOI — not checkedAre Legislators Ideologues or the Agents of Constituents?
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedUSA Inc.: Congress Helped Banks Defang Key Rule
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedA $600 Billion Toll?
no DOI — not checkedDemocrats Face an Emerging Split; Presidential Field Divides Over Issue of Endorsing Limits on Stock Options
no DOI — not checkedAre Bean Counters to Blame
no DOI — not checkedFASB Chief Says Congress Is Meddling
no DOI — not checkedWho Made the Biggest Bucks?
no DOI — not checkedMark-toMarket Accounting: Practices and Implications. Hearing
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedThe Rise of Economic Consequences
no DOI — not checkedThe Evolution of U.S. GAAP: The Political Forces behind Professional Standards
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-16 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2972549"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2972549/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2972549)