Reference health
Managerial Structure and Performance-Induced Trading
58/58 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 58 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00594.x
Moderation in Groups: Evidence from Betting on Ice Break-ups in Alaska
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1621
Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.23
Social anxiety, self-presentation, and the self-serving bias in causal attribution.
resolves10.1093/rof/rfq014
Is a Team Different from the Sum of its Parts? Evidence from Mutual Fund Managers
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00226
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb02321.x
Investment Management and Risk Sharing with Multiple Managers
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1070.0830
Are Overconfident CEOs Born or Made? Evidence of Self-Attribution Bias from Frequent Acquirers
resolves10.1111/jofi.12006
Outsourcing Mutual Fund Management: Firm Boundaries, Incentives, and Performance
resolves10.1257/0002828054201431
Are Two Heads Better Than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.001
The dynamics of overconfidence: Evidence from stock market forecasters
resolves10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00371.x
Acquisitions, Overconfident Managers and Self‐attribution Bias
resolves10.1177/0146167204271570
Peering Into the Bias Blind Spot: People’s Assessments of Bias in Themselves and Others
resolves10.1086/374182
Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation
resolves10.1007/BF00057884
Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.951
Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task.
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002
Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction☆
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure
resolves10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02237.x
Overconfidence Among Professional Investors: Evidence from Mutual Fund Managers
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.001
Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(68)90069-3
Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6
Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?
resolves10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.002
Implicit Bias and Accountability Systems: What Must Organizations Do to Prevent Discrimination?
resolves10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.009
Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(65)90034-X
The roles of information, discussion, and consensus in group risk taking
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb00803.x
Preference, Expectations, and Attributional Bias: Two Field Studies<sup>1</sup>
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGroups make better self-interested decisions
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedOvercondence and early-life experiences: The eect of managerial traits on corporate nancial policies
no DOI — not checkedLiquidity risk and expected stock returns
no DOI — not checkedTo group or not to group? Evidence from mutual fund databases
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedMaking dumb groups smarter
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2978811"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2978811/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2978811)