Reference health
Many-Citednesss: Citations Measure More than Just Scientific Impact
2 of 55 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-29
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00500.x
does not resolve to a known work10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::aid-asi1542>3.3.co;2-k
The 53 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.lisr.2013.08.001
Measuring social capital through network analysis and its influence on individual performance
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.002
Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender?
resolves10.1007/s11192-016-1929-y
Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise
resolves10.2307/2657504
Normative versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.004
Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy
resolves10.1016/j.econmod.2017.05.018
Co-authorship and research productivity in economics: Assessing the assortative matching hypothesis
resolves10.3354/esep00084
Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results
resolves10.1087/095315108x378712
Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation
resolves10.1089/ees.2016.0223
Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2709107
What 5,000 Acknowledgements Tell Us About Informal Collaboration in Financial Economics
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2877586
The Importance of Informal Intellectual Collaboration with Central Colleagues
resolves10.1080/13501763.2015.1106573
The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity
resolves10.1177/030631291021003003
Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Reflexive Citation Analysis or Science Disciplines and Disciplining Science
resolves10.31235/osf.io/wqy2s
Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time
resolves10.1007/s11192-007-1659-2
On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00575.x
An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision‐Makers
resolves10.1073/pnas.0806977105
Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015
How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0033339
A Small World of Citations? The Influence of Collaboration Networks on Citation Practices
resolves10.1002/asi.10369
Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the “Globenet” interdisciplinary research group
resolves10.1086/629929
A Qualitative Study of Citing Behavior: Contributions, Criteria, and Metalevel Documentation Concerns
resolves10.1002/asi.21128
Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2420421
Are We Really Doing What We Think We Are Doing? A Note on Finite-Sample Estimates of Two-Way Cluster-Robust Standard Errors
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedOn the Evaluation of Economic Research: The case of Italy
no DOI — not checkedNetworks in Economics . A Perspective on the Literature
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref60
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2993971"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2993971/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.2993971)