Reference health

Big 4 Auditors, Litigation Risk, and Disclosure Tone

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3002548
CiteStamped reference-health badge
28/28 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/s0165-4101(00)00012-4
The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings
resolves10.1016/s0165-4101(97)00014-1
The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings1
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2428836
Differences in Conservatism between Big Eight and Non-Big Eight Auditors
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management*
resolves10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.327
Audit Quality and Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecasts
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679x.2010.00396.x
Large‐Sample Evidence on Firms’ Year‐over‐Year MD&A Modifications
resolves10.1111/1475-679x.12105
Auditor–Client Compatibility and Audit Firm Selection
resolves10.1111/1475-679x.12094
A New Measure of Disclosure Quality: The Level of Disaggregation of Accounting Data in Annual Reports
resolves10.20955/wp.2006.005
Beyond the Numbers: An Analysis of Optimistic and Pessimistic Language in Earnings Press Releases
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01125.x
Managers’ Use of Language Across Alternative Disclosure Outlets: Earnings Press Releases versus MD&A*
resolves10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
Auditor size and audit quality
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01047.x
Do Private Company Targets that Hire Big 4 Auditors Receive Higher Proceeds?*
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2016.2528
Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching
resolves10.2308/accr-51150
Client Conservatism and Auditor-Client Contracting
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
A review of archival auditing research
resolves10.1023/b:rast.0000013628.49401.69
Audit Firm Industry Specialization and Client Disclosure Quality
resolves10.1086/261908
Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.07.002
The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation
resolves10.26481/spe.20090911rk
Audit lessons from the economic Crisis: Rethinking audit quality
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12011
Office Size of Big 4 Auditors and Client Restatements
resolves10.1093/pan/mpr025
Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies
resolves10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0
Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature
resolves10.2308/accr-50684
Tone Management
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002
Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism
resolves10.2308/accr-10137
Disclosure Tone and Shareholder Litigation
resolves10.2308/accr-50198
Audit Quality and Auditor Reputation: Evidence from Japan
resolves10.1111/1475-679x.00120
Do Expert Informational Intermediaries Add Value? Evidence from Auditors in Microcap Initial Public Offerings
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00298.x
Does Auditor Reputation Matter? The Case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedDiscussion paper: Enhancing the auditor's contribution to prudential regulation
no DOI — not checkedDiscussion paper: The evolving nature of financial reporting: Disclosure and its audit implications
no DOI — not checkedAddressing disclosures in the audit of financial statements -Revised ISAs and related conforming amendments
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence
no DOI — not checkedPerceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3002548"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3002548/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3002548/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3002548)