Reference health
Testimonial Advertising on Social Networks to Existing Customers and New Customers
1 of 14 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74
The 13 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2501/s0021849907070031
The Effectiveness of “Typical-User” Testimonial Advertisements on Black and White Browsers’ Evaluations of Products on Commercial Websites: Do They Really Work?
resolves10.3982/ecta12423
Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large-Scale Field Experiment
resolves10.1109/hicss.2010.412
Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter
resolves10.1509/jmr.12.0063
Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth
resolves10.1287/mksc.20.4.442.9751
Endogeneity and Heterogeneity in a Probit Demand Model: Estimation Using Aggregate Data
resolves10.1177/002224377901600409
A Comparison of Two Logit Models in the Analysis of Qualitative Marketing Data
resolves10.2753/joa0091-3367370103
Effects of Susceptibility to Normative Influence and Type of Testimonial on Attitudes Toward Print Advertising
resolves10.1109/socialcom.2010.33
Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network
resolves10.1287/mksc.2013.0773
Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?
resolves10.1287/isre.2015.0617
Research Note—When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedEffectiveness of celebrity endorsers
no DOI — not checkedAdvertising spokesperson effects-an examination of endorser type and gender on 2 audiences
no DOI — not checkedref13
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3013894"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3013894/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3013894)