Reference health

Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3043985
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 49 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

29 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1023/A:1015141611741
The 48 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1110.1428
Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?
resolves10.1287/msom.2015.0554
The Limits of Planned Obsolescence for Conspicuous Durable Goods
resolves10.1111/1468-2354.00057
Costly Search, Capacity Constraints, and Bertrand Equilibrium Price Dispersion
resolves10.1201/9781420095265-c3
Environmental Legislation on Product Take-Back and Recovery
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01004.x
Efficient Take‐Back Legislation
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01327.x
Extended Producer Responsibility for E‐Waste: Individual or Collective Producer Responsibility?
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01290.x
How Does Product Recovery Affect Quality Choice?
resolves10.1111/jiec.12297
Closed‐Loop Supply Chains for Photovoltaic Panels: A Case‐Based Approach
resolves10.15373/2249555x/may2014/111
http://www.theglobaljournals.com/ijar/file.php?val=May_2014_1398965985_e9548_110.pdf
resolves10.2307/1884176
An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence
resolves10.1257/aer.90.2.233
Can Downstream Waste Disposal Policies Encourage Upstream “Design for Environment”?
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1060.0581
Quality-Based Competition, Profitability, and Variable Costs
resolves10.1287/mnsc.47.2.250.9841
Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development
resolves10.2307/2950488
Network Externality, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence
resolves10.1086/466731
Durability and Monopoly
resolves10.1287/mnsc.44.11.s19
Leasing and Selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm
resolves10.1533/9780857096333.1.53
The present recast of the WEEE Directive
resolves10.9785/cr-2017-0809
Auslegung von Willenserklärungen bei eBay-Verkaufsaktion – Grenze der eBay-AGB
resolves10.1007/s00712-002-0607-0
Efficient Management of Product Durability and Recyclability under Utilitarian and Chichilnisky Preferences
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2694819
Valuable E-Waste: Implications for Extended Producer Responsibility
resolves10.1111/deci.12174
Take‐Back Legislation: Consequences for Remanufacturing and Environment
resolves10.1111/poms.12213
A Comparison of Product Take‐Back Compliance Schemes
resolves10.1016/c2016-0-01999-x
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Recycling
resolves10.1557/proc-0895-g03-06
Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Life Cycle of CdTe Photovoltaics
resolves10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.002
Photovoltaics: Life-cycle analyses
resolves10.1006/jeem.1998.1044
Policies for Green Design
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2163
Efficient Implementation of Collective Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation
resolves10.1257/aer.89.5.1097
Adverse Selection in Durable Goods Markets
resolves10.2307/2556043
Interfering with Secondary Markets
resolves10.1002/pip.1068
Update of environmental indicators and energy payback time of CdTe PV systems in Europe
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.013
Moving beyond the “patchwork:” a review of strategies to promote consistency for extended producer responsibility policy in the U.S.
resolves10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1515.10250
A Theory of Finitely Durable Goods Monopoly with Used-Goods Market and Transaction Costs
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01246.x
Sharing Responsibility for Product Recovery Across the Supply Chain
resolves10.1002/pip.1182
Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review
resolves10.1080/10168738900080020
TRADE IN USED GOODS AND DURABILITY CHOICE
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1502.265
Product Design with Multiple Quality-Type Attributes
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0492
Designing a Family of Development-Intensive Products
resolves10.1287/mksc.7.2.141
Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly
resolves10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00572.x
Extended Producer Responsibility in the United States
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1080.0970
Effects of E-Waste Regulation on New Product Introduction
resolves10.1287/mksc.13.4.392
What Should You Do When Your Competitors Send in the Clones?
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.028
Vehicle recycling regulations: lessons from Denmark
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01018.x
Product Design and Supply Chain Coordination Under Extended Producer Responsibility
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01207.x
An Analysis of Monopolistic and Competitive Take‐Back Schemes for WEEE Recycling
resolves10.2307/41166178
The Growing Strategic Importance of End-of-Life Product Management
resolves10.1007/978-94-011-0856-0_12
The Role of Economic Instruments in Solid Waste Management Policy
resolves10.1086/209702
Durable Goods Pricing When Quality Matters
resolves10.1257/089533003321164985
Durable Goods Theory for Real World Markets
The 29 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental Impact of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Production
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedPersonal communications
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedPhotovoltaics Energy Payback Times
no DOI — not checkedUpdate of Environmental Impacts and Energy Payback Times of Photovoltaics
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedLife Cycle Assessment of CdTe Module Recycling
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedWorst Over for Solar Sector
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedElectronic Waste Prevention
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedref76
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3043985"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3043985/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3043985/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3043985)