Reference health
Click Here to Consent Forever: Expiry Dates for Informed Consent
1 of 23 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-09-17
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00292.x/abstract
The 22 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1108/14684520710832342
The impact of reading a web site's privacy statement on perceived control over privacy and perceived trust
resolves10.1007/978-3-540-27834-4_5
“I Need It Now”: Improving Website Usability by Contextualizing Privacy Policies
resolves10.1002/1944-2866.poi366
Privacy Expectations of Social Media Users: The Role of Informed Consent in Privacy Policies
resolves10.2966/scrip.100413.435
Informed Consent in Social Media Use – The Gap between User Expectations and EU Personal Data Protection Law
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1986719
Forgetting Footprints, Shunning Shadows: A Critical Analysis of the 'Right to Be Forgotten' in Big Data Practice
resolves10.1073/pnas.1218772110
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00071.x
Promoting<i>i</i>‐Safety: Effects of Privacy Warnings and Privacy Seals on Risk Assessment and Online Privacy Behavior
resolves10.1109/hicss.2003.1174470
Adding value to online privacy for consumers: remedying deficiencies in online privacy policies with an holistic approach
resolves10.1002/dir.20009
Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don't read) online privacy notices
resolves10.1016/j.jretai.2006.08.006
Exploring the impact of online privacy disclosures on consumer trust
resolves10.1509/jppm.2005.24.2.273
In Poor Health: An Assessment of Privacy Policies at Direct-to-Consumer Web Sites
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedCultures of the Internet: The Internet in Britain
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedThe cost of reading privacy policies. I/S Journal for Law and Policy for the Information Society
no DOI — not checkedSchermer BW, Custers BHM and Van der Hof S (2014) The crisis of consent: How stronger legal protection may lead to weaker consent in data protection
no DOI — not checkedPrivacy self-management and the consent dilemma
no DOI — not checkedExtramarital affair website Ashley Madison has been hacked and attackers are threatening to leak data online
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-17 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3047128"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3047128/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3047128)