Reference health
Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists
1 of 62 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-2909.114.3.494
The 61 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007
Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures
resolves10.1002/asi.21486
Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0051332
The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact
resolves10.17705/1jais.00416
Co-authorship, Homophily, and Scholarly Influence in Information Systems Research
resolves10.1126/science.1106340
Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance
resolves10.1126/science.294.5541.396
General Contentment Masks Gender Gap in First AAAS Salary and Job Survey
resolves10.1177/016224399602100103
Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity
resolves10.1126/science.1261375
Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines
resolves10.1097/ACM.0000000000001261
Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1992.tb01536.x
THE EFFECT OF GENDER‐SORTING ON PROPENSITY TO COAUTHOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACADEMIC PROMOTION
resolves10.1177/000312240406900204
The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999
resolves10.2307/3088904
Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups
resolves10.1073/pnas.1501444112
Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers
resolves10.1080/00221546.1994.11778526
Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time,
resolves10.23987/sts.55226
A Career-History Analysis of Gender Differences in Publication Productivity among South African Academics
resolves10.1109/asonam.2010.35
Learning from the Past: An Analysis of Person Name Corrections in DBLP Collection and Social Network Properties of Affected Entities
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.001
Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0114302
The Evolution of Your Success Lies at the Centre of Your Co-Authorship Network
resolves10.1177/0049124111404820
Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950
Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Science?: A Critical Review.
resolves10.1073/pnas.1510159112
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands
resolves10.1073/pnas.1702121114
The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.018
Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.1002573
Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender
resolves10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000530)19:10<1265::aid-sim486>3.0.co;2-u
Summarizing the goodness of fit of generalized linear models for longitudinal data
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCareer age and research-professional activities of academic scientists: Tests of alternative nonlinear models and some implications for higher education faculty policies
no DOI — not checkedGender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review, Special report
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedThe productivity puzzle: Persistence and changes in patterns of publication of men and women scientists
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedThe essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research
no DOI — not checkedMen's creative production rate at different ages and in different countries
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref70
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3063273"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3063273/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3063273)