Reference health

Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3073165
CiteStamped reference-health badge
52/52 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 52 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/23044051
The More, the Merrier? How the Number of Partners in a Standard-Setting Initiative Affects Shareholder’s Risk and Return1
resolves10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00062.x
Coordination versus differentiation in a standards war: 56K modems
resolves10.1111/jems.12044
Committee Composition and Networking in Standard Setting: The Case of Wireless Telecommunications
resolves10.1111/jems.12258
Unpacking 3GPP standards
resolves10.1093/joclec/nht034
WHO COOPERATES IN STANDARDS CONSORTIA--RIVALS OR COMPLEMENTORS?
resolves10.1111/jems.12255
Mapping standards to patents using declarations of standard‐essential patents
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2478707
Technological Standardization, Endogenous Productivity and Transitory Dynamics
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.05.004
Standards, consortia, and innovation
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.004
Essential patents and standard dynamics
resolves10.4018/978-1-60566-986-1.ch019
Standards, Patents and Mobile Phones
resolves10.1016/s0176-2680(01)00073-8
Coordination on formal vs. de facto standards: a dynamic approach
resolves10.1257/jep.8.2.117
Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization
resolves10.1007/s11123-007-0060-8
The impact of patents and standards on macroeconomic growth: a panel approach covering four countries and 12 sectors
resolves10.1109/tem.2012.2192935
Alliance Formation of SMEs: Empirical Evidence From Standardization Committees
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2004.08.007
Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications
resolves10.1257/aer.20140316
The Politics of Compromise
resolves10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00118.x
The rules of standard‐setting organizations: an empirical analysis
resolves10.1093/ei/cbi034
INEFFICIENT STANDARD ADOPTION: INERTIA AND MOMENTUM REVISITED
resolves10.1080/10438599000000002
The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.2139/ssrn.903214
Strategic Behavior in Standard-Setting Organizations
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.07.004
Innovating standards through informal consortia: The case of wireless telecommunications
resolves10.1162/105864003322309518
The DVD-vs.-DIVX Standard War: Empirical Evidence of Network Effects and Preannouncement Effects
resolves10.1016/0176-2680(95)00014-3
Network externalities, complementarities, and invitations to enter
resolves10.2307/2555589
Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
resolves10.2307/2555702
Coordination Through Committees and Markets
resolves10.1111/j.1756-2171.2012.00164.x
Choosing the rules for consensus standardization
resolves10.1016/s1574-0145(06)01001-4
Chapter 1 Diffusion of Information and Communication Technologies to Businesses
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511493249.007
Intellectual property and standardization committee participation in the US modem industry
resolves10.1007/bf01047751
Voting on standardisation
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511493249.001
Introduction
resolves10.7551/mitpress/5263.001.0001
Patents, Citations, and Innovations
resolves10.1086/261409
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities
resolves10.2307/2556103
R&amp;D in the Presence of Network Externalities: Timing and Compatibility
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1080.0912
Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications
resolves10.2307/3481437
Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations
resolves10.1257/aer.96.4.1091
A Model of Forum Shopping
resolves10.1086/680995
Standard-Essential Patents
resolves10.1086/467198
The Fable of the Keys
resolves10.2307/2555701
"Mix and Match": Product Compatibility without Network Externalities
resolves10.2307/2950626
Compatibility and Bundling of Complementary Goods in a Duopoly
resolves10.5465/amj.2011.1064
Do Ties Really Bind? The Effect of Knowledge and Commercialization Networks on Opposition to Standards
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1080.0919
Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations
resolves10.1093/joclec/nht040
THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART I: ROYALTIES
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhv005
THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART II: INJUNCTIONS
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511493249.009
Delay and de jure standardization: exploring the slowdown in Internet standards development
resolves10.1257/aer.102.1.305
Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhm031
CONSUMER COORDINATION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE: IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTITRUST IN MARKETS WITH NETWORK EFFECTS
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhn016
UNLOCKING TECHNOLOGY: ANTITRUST AND INNOVATION
resolves10.1093/joclec/nht041
INNOVATION ECONOMICS: THE INTERPLAY AMONG TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS, COMPETITIVE CONDUCT, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2865763
Standard Setting Organizations and Standard Essential Patents: Voting and Markets
resolves10.1787/5kmdbg9xktwg-en
International Standards and Trade
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0
How open is open enough?
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedStandard-setting consortia, antitrust, and high-technology industries
no DOI — not checkedwhat's an open standard?" says iso
no DOI — not checkedA study of ipr policies and practices of a representative group of standards setting organizations worldwide. Project on intellectual property management in standard-setting processes
no DOI — not checkedProduct line rivalry
no DOI — not checkedA brief history of frand: Analyzing current debates in standard setting and antitrust through a historical lens
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedInstalled base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation
no DOI — not checkedNetwork externalities, competition, and compatibility
no DOI — not checkedThe evolution of ict standards consortia
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedStandard setting, intellectual property rights, and the role of antitrust in regulating incomplete contracts
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3073165"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3073165/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3073165/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3073165)