Reference health
Do Citizens Prefer Affluent Representatives? Evidence from a Survey Experiment In Switzerland
42/42 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-19
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 42 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1163/156913307x187414
New Challenges, New Elites? Changes in the Recruitment and Career Patterns of European Representative Elites
resolves10.2307/40184446
Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848-2000. Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries
resolves10.2307/3005879
Income, Economic Voting, and Long-Term Political Change in the U.S., 1952- 1996
resolves10.1111/1467-856x.12002
Rich Man, Poor Man, Politician Man: Wealth Effects in a Candidate Biography Survey Experiment
resolves10.1111/1467-9248.12048
What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment
resolves10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas
resolves10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x
Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?
resolves10.1111/ajps.12112
Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class and Representation: Evidence from Latin America
resolves10.1017/s0003055416000551
Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class
resolves10.1177/0032318716640611
The effect of political candidates’ occupational background on voters’ perceptions of and support for candidates
resolves10.1057/bp.2012.28
Why not ask the audience? Understanding the public's representational priorities
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00509.x
Personal Income and Attitudes toward Redistribution: A Study of Lottery Winners
resolves10.1017/s0007123411000202
How Parties Shape Class Politics: Explaining the Decline of the Class Basis of Party Support
resolves10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.021
Local candidates and voter mobilization: Evidence from historical two-round elections in Norway
resolves10.1561/100.00006026
Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What’s the Matter with Connecticut?
resolves10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02008.x
Not just ‘friends and neighbours’: Canvassing, geographic proximity and voter choice
resolves10.1093/pan/mpt024
Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments
resolves10.1073/pnas.1416587112
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior
resolves10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.11.008
It's the occupation, stupid! Explaining candidates' success in low-information elections
resolves10.1080/13572334.2013.812363
Are the Policy Preferences of Relatively Poor Citizens Under-represented in the Swiss Parliament?
resolves10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00133.x
Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote‐Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedMillionaires' Club: For First Time, Most Lawmakers are Worth $1 Million-Plus
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedFederalist 35
no DOI — not checkedCohesion of Party Groups and Interparty Conflict in the Swiss Parliament: Roll Call Voting in the National Council
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedHow Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedCampaigning with Class: The Effect of Candidate Wealth on Voters' Evaluations
no DOI — not checkedref57
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-19 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3077598"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3077598/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3077598)