Reference health
Investors' Perpective on Portfolio Insurance - Expected Utility vs Prospect Theories
45/45 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-20
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
29 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.002
Performance evaluation of portfolio insurance strategies using stochastic dominance criteria
resolves10.1080/03461238.2014.954606
Dynamic preferences for popular investment strategies in pension funds
resolves10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.009
Equilibrium of financial derivative markets under portfolio insurance constraints
resolves10.1016/S0165-1889(02)00052-0
Benchmarking, portfolio insurance and technical analysis: a Monte Carlo comparison of dynamic strategies of asset allocation
resolves10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.030
Dynamic proportion portfolio insurance using genetic programming with principal component analysis☆
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(86)90076-1
An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom
resolves10.1007/s10258-017-0133-1
One-period pricing strategy of ‘money doctors’ under cumulative prospect theory
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.11.012
Portfolio insurance and prospect theory investors: Popularity and optimal design of capital protected financial products
resolves10.1111/1467-629X.00078
Relative performance of dynamic portfolio insurance strategies: Australian evidence
resolves10.1086/261141
Stochastic Consumption, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Asset Returns
resolves10.1080/14697688.2012.661872
The payoff distribution model: an application to dynamic portfolio insurance
resolves10.1016/j.jedc.2016.05.015
Does relative risk aversion vary with wealth? Evidence from households׳ portfolio choice data
The 29 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedBounds to the coefficient of relative risk aversion
no DOI — not checkedComparing portfolio insurance strategies
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedAlpha-nu choice theory: an axiomatization of expected utility, working paper, University of British Columbia Chew SH (1983) A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the allais paradox
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio insurance-a comparison of naive versus popular strategies
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedThe demand for risky assets
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedWhat you need to know about constant relative risk aversion
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio insurance strategies: Review of theory and empirical studies
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio insurance strategies
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio insurance in the long term asset management
no DOI — not checkedThe evolution of portfolio insurance
no DOI — not checkedApproximating expected utility by a function of mean and variance
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio selection
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedRecent developments into portfolio insurance
no DOI — not checkedDynamic strategies for asset allocation
no DOI — not checkedCppi with cushion insurance, tHEMA University of Cergy-Pontoise working paper Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility
no DOI — not checkedThe real world pitfalls of portfolio insurance
no DOI — not checkedAdd portfolio insurance just in case of market crash in 2016
no DOI — not checkedSt. petersburg paradoxes: Defanged, dissected, and historically described
no DOI — not checkedA stock market panic like 1987 could happen again
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio insurance strategies: friend or foe?
no DOI — not checkedWhere are the risks?
no DOI — not checkedWhy is portfolio insurance attractive to investors?, available at SSRN Wasik JF (2015) For investors, 'portfolio insurance' against market declines
no DOI — not checkedRise in new form of 'portfolio insurance' sparks fears
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-20 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3173539"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3173539/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3173539)