Reference health
Methods to Account for Citation Inflation in Research Evaluation
56/56 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 56 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5
The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance
resolves10.1093/rev/1.1.21
Citation indicators and peer review: their time-scales, criteria of evaluation, and biases
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.006
Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?
resolves10.1002/asi.20744
Long‐term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady‐state science (1900–2004)
resolves10.1073/pnas.0806977105
Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2011.09.002
Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.002
A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.005
The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.014
Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network
resolves10.1007/s11192-007-1680-5
Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists’ field mobility?
resolves10.1007/s11192-010-0187-7
Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: effects of different calculation methods
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.009
Manipulation of explicit reputation in innovation and knowledge exchange communities: The example of referencing in science
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.025
Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004
Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0033833
A Reverse Engineering Approach to the Suppression of Citation Biases Reveals Universal Properties of Citation Distributions
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.001
The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits
resolves10.1073/pnas.1501444112
Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.009
Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship
resolves10.1140/epjb/e2010-10647-1
Methods for detrending success metrics to account for inflationary and deflationary factors*
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedPublication Years". In order to circumscribe the set of target subject articles, we select the "Web of Science Categories" tab, and then set the"Show" tab to 100; then proceed to select "Update Table
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedFollowing from the previous step, the new search query will identify a new set of articles from journals belonging to the set of circumscribing WC. Select "Analyze Results" to again go to the "Results Analysis" page. Then select the "Publication Years" tab on the left, and again select
no DOI — not checkedCitation analysis in research evaluation
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedHighly Cited Researchers (h>100) according to their Google Scholar Citations public profiles
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref55
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3193712"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3193712/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3193712)