Reference health
Effects of Jurors' Gender and Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability on Judgments in Cases Involving Disabled Juvenile Defendants
28/28 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.ridd.2005.07.003
Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities
resolves10.1023/A:1022551314668
Jurors' perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities.
resolves10.1080/07418820300095461
Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded
resolves10.1007/BF01501659
The juvenile death penalty and the Eighth Amendment: An empirical investigation of societal consensus and proportionality.
resolves10.1037/law0000006
Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments.
resolves10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.
resolves10.1177/1073191103259535
Juvenile Offenders’ Miranda Rights Comprehension and Self-Reported Likelihood of Offering False Confessions
resolves10.2224/sbp.1973.1.1.1
SIMULATED JURY DECISIONS: THE INFLUENCE OF JURY-DEFENDANT ATTITUDE SIMILARITY-DISSIMILARITY
resolves10.1023/A:1005592213294
Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
resolves10.1037/a0027808
Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation?
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21
Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency.
resolves10.1002/bsl.873
Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence
resolves10.1348/135532505X73768
Trial venue decisions in juvenile cases: Mitigating and extralegal factors matter
resolves10.3758/BF03200807
SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00323.x
Perceptions of Children During a Police Interview: A Comparison of Alleged Victims and Suspects<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1002/bsl.921
Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat
resolves10.1007/BF01499324
First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials.
resolves10.2224/sbp.1995.23.4.319
EFFECTS OF PROHIBITIVE AND INFORMATIVE JUDICIAL INSTRUCTIONS ON JURY DECISIONMAKING
resolves10.1007/BF01499331
Societal views of justice for adolescents accused of murder: Inconsistency between community sentiment and automatic legislative transfers.
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00499.x
Race Shapes Perceptions of Juvenile Offenders in Criminal Court<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1007/s10979-005-7978-y
Competence to Waive Interrogation Rights and Adjudicative Competence in Adolescent Defendants: Cognitive Development, Attorney Contact, and Psychological Symptoms.
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedKentucky v. English trial story [Motion picture]
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedA review of factors affecting jurors' decisions in child sexual abuse cases
no DOI — not checkedReactions to the criminal behavior of intellectually disabled and nondisabled offenders
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedAdolescent development, mental disorders, and decision making of delinquent youths
no DOI — not checkedBeyond Atkins: A symposium on the implications of Atkins v
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedUnderstanding adults' perceptions of juvenile offenders
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3198794"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3198794/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3198794)