Reference health
Physicians with Multiple Paid Medical Malpractice Claims: Are They Outliers or Just Unlucky?
2 of 16 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-29
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1001/jama.272.18.1421
does not resolve to a known work10.1001/jama.266.15.2093
The 14 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.023
Provider and Practice Factors Associated With Emergency Physicians’ Being Named in a Malpractice Claim
resolves10.2307/2290560
Using Medical Malpractice Data to Predict the Frequency of Claims: A Study of Poisson Process Models With Random Effects
resolves10.1111/jels.12021
The Receding Tide of Medical Malpractice Litigation: Part 1—National Trends
resolves10.1111/jels.12113
Insurance Crisis or Liability Crisis? Medical Malpractice Claiming in Illinois, 1980–2010
resolves10.1111/jels.12173
Screening Plaintiffs and Selecting Defendants in Medical Malpractice Litigation: Evidence from Illinois and Indiana
resolves10.1056/nejmsa054479
Claims, Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation
resolves10.1056/nejmsa1506137
Prevalence and Characteristics of Physicians Prone to Malpractice Claims
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGeorgia suspends medical license of jailed surgeon 'Dr. Hazmat
no DOI — not checkedVA knowingly hires doctors with past malpractice claims, discipline for poor care
no DOI — not checkedImproved Policies and Oversight Needed for Reviewing and Reporting Providers for Quality and Safety Concerns, GAO 18-63
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref21
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3201919"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3201919/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3201919)