Reference health

An Alternative Behavioral Explanation for the MAX Effect

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3214438
CiteStamped reference-health badge
80/80 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 80 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb03466.x
Quarterly Dividend and Earnings Announcements and Stockholders' Returns: An Empirical Analysis
resolves10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6
Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00531.x
Option Trading, Price Discovery, and Earnings News Dissemination*
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2018.3205
Lottery-Related Anomalies: The Role of Reference-Dependent Preferences
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected Returns
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.05.015
Are extreme returns priced in the stock market? European evidence
resolves10.1017/S0022109017000035
Information Characteristics and Errors in Expectations: Experimental Evidence
resolves10.1111/jofi.12010
Noisy Prices and Inference Regarding Returns
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01060.x
Liquidity and Autocorrelations in Individual Stock Returns
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x
Investor Sentiment and the Cross‐Section of Stock Returns
resolves10.1017/S0022109017000928
A Lottery-Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.014
Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns
resolves10.1093/rfs/hht074
Liquidity Shocks and Stock Market Reactions
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00226
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm079
All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhn035
Do Retail Trades Move Markets?
resolves10.1257/aer.98.5.2066
Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhw049
Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.007
Stocks with extreme past returns: Lotteries or insurance?
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1100.1286
Reference-Point Formation and Updating
resolves10.2307/2491062
Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium?
resolves10.1016/0165-4101(90)90008-R
Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings
resolves10.1080/15427560.2019.1672167
Does Probability Weighting Drive Lottery Preferences?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhp041
Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness
resolves10.1093/rfs/15.2.575
Competing Theories of Financial Anomalies
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00146-6
Stock price reaction to news and no-news: drift and reversal after headlines
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2017.2830
Maxing Out Globally: Individualism, Investor Attention, and the Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns
resolves10.1093/rfs/2.2.225
Mean Reversion in Short-Horizon Expected Returns
resolves10.1080/07350015.1997.10524715
Profitability of Short-Term Contrarian Strategies: Implications for Market Efficiency
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.012
Salience theory and stock prices: Empirical evidence
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00884.x
Market Reactions to Tangible and Intangible Information
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00077
Investor Psychology and Security Market Under‐ and Overreactions
resolves10.1086/261703
Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01447.x
Investor Inattention and Friday Earnings Announcements
resolves10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.03.001
The robust “maximum daily return effect as demand for lottery” and “idiosyncratic volatility puzzle”
resolves10.1111/jofi.12718
Anomalies and News
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
resolves10.1086/260061
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.05.006
Investor sentiment and the MAX effect
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00695.x
The 52‐Week High and Momentum Investing
resolves10.1002/bdm.1773
True Overconfidence in Interval Estimates: Evidence Based on a New Measure of Miscalibration
resolves10.1093/rof/rfm008
Framing Effects in Stock Market Forecasts: The Difference Between Asking for Prices and Asking for Returns
resolves10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-R
The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.006
Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum
resolves10.1017/S0022109013000100
Speculative Retail Trading and Asset Prices
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00184
A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.02.013
Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04494.x
Earnings Announcements, Stock Price Adjustment, and the Existence of Option Markets
resolves10.1037/h0034747
On the psychology of prediction.
resolves10.2307/1914185
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511809477
Judgment under Uncertainty
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2017.2838
Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift and the Return Predictability of Earnings Levels: One Effect or Two?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01483.x
Who Gambles in the Stock Market?
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.285595
The Impact of Options Trading on the Market Quality of the Underlying Security: An Empirical Analysis
resolves10.1016/j.finmar.2016.03.001
Short selling around the 52-week and historical highs
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.04.003
Investor attention, psychological anchors, and stock return predictability
resolves10.1023/A:1024477831740
Post-Earnings Announcement Drift and Market Participants' Information Processing Biases
resolves10.1093/rfs/3.2.175
When Are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?
resolves10.2308/accr-50158
Investor Sentiment and Stock Market Response to Earnings News
resolves10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.04.002
Biased information weight processing in stock markets
resolves10.1016/j.finmar.2018.05.001
When are extreme daily returns not lottery? At earnings announcements!
resolves10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.003
The other side of value: The gross profitability premium
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00078
Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.05.003
Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning
resolves10.1016/S0378-4266(00)00091-1
Return predictability following large price changes and information releases
resolves10.1086/374184
Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2019.3404
Capital Gains Overhang with a Dynamic Reference Point
resolves10.2307/1886087
Options and Efficiency
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.06.011
Stock returns after major price shocks: The impact of information
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03807.x
The Limits of Arbitrage
resolves10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.03.002
When is a MAX not the MAX? How news resolves information uncertainty
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhq052
Does Public Financial News Resolve Asymmetric Information?
resolves10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
resolves10.1007/BF00122574
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.01.020
The MAX effect: European evidence
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.09.010
Reference-dependent preferences and the risk–return trade-off
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00831.x
Information Uncertainty and Stock Returns
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.01.007
The MAX effect: An exploration of risk and mispricing explanations
resolves10.2307/1913610
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedA model of investor sentiment
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedThe role of psychological barriers in lotteryrelated anomalies
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedReactions to news and reasoning by exemplars, Working Paper
no DOI — not checkedSkewness, individual investor preference, and the cross-section of stock returns
no DOI — not checkedA simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedA model of investor sentiment
no DOI — not checkedLiquidity risk and expected stock returns
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3214438"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3214438/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3214438/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3214438)