Reference health
Informed Acquirers and M&A Outcomes
53/53 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 53 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00307
Corporate Equity Ownership, Strategic Alliances, and Product Market Relationships
resolves10.1007/s00712-003-0061-7
Conditions for Asymmetric Information Solutions when Alliances Provide Acquisition Options and Due Diligence
resolves10.1017/S0022109018000716
The Effect of Cultural Similarity on Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from Corporate Social Responsibility
resolves10.1002/smj.2533
Money secrets: How does trade secret legal protection affect firm market value? Evidence from the uniform trade secret act
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2020.3707
Human Capital-Driven Acquisition: Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01508.x
Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00871.x
Corporate Equity Ownership and the Governance of Product Market Relationships
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.010
Equity links and information acquisition in biotechnology alliances
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.04.002
The effects of proprietary information on corporate disclosure and transparency: Evidence from trade secrets
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhy101
Analyst Career Concerns, Effort Allocation, and Firms’ Information Environment
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.02.004
Hedge funds, insiders, and the decoupling of economic and voting ownership: Empty voting and hidden (morphable) ownership
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2018.3085
Technology Conglomeration, Strategic Alliances, and Corporate Innovation
resolves10.1111/1475-679X.12082
Do Improvements in the Information Environment Enhance Insiders’ Ability to Learn from Outsiders?
resolves10.1007/s11142-021-09641-5
The disclosure function of the U.S. patent system: evidence from the PTDL program and extreme snowfall
resolves10.1002/smj.2387
Agglomeration and the choice between acquisitions and alliances: An information economics perspective
resolves10.1007/s11142-014-9283-x
The effect of target-firm accounting quality on valuation in acquisitions
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106574
The evolution of bidder gains and acquisition discounts in M&A
resolves10.1016/0167-2681(92)90015-4
Incumbents' use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm040
How Do Diversity of Opinion and Information Asymmetry Affect Acquirer Returns?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhs125
What Motivates Minority Acquisitions? The Trade-Offs between a Partial Equity Stake and Complete Integration
resolves10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.04.001
Getting to know each other: The role of toeholds in acquisitions
resolves10.1287/orsc.1110.0692
The Choice Between Joint Ventures and Acquisitions: Insights from Signaling Theory
resolves10.1016/0304-405X(83)90006-5
Evidence on the capitalized value of merger activity for acquiring firms
resolves10.2308/jmar-52302
Information Availability in Acquisition Decisions: The Role of Prior Relations and Rival Bidders
resolves10.1287/orsc.1100.0528
Prior Alliances with Targets and Acquisition Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Industries
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedPre-disclosure accumulations by activist investors: evidence and policy
no DOI — not checkedThe (missing) relation between acquisition announcement returns and value creation
no DOI — not checkedMerger negotiations and the toehold puzzle
no DOI — not checkedLabor mobility and antitakeover provisions
no DOI — not checkedCreeping acquisitions in Europe: Enabling companies to be better safe than sorry
no DOI — not checkedActively keeping secrets from creditors: evidence from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedThe geography of block acquisitions
no DOI — not checkedThe uniform trade secrets act: the states' response
no DOI — not checkedref64
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checked38 3 Pennsylvania 2004 141 7 South Carolina 1992 8 1 Tennessee 2000 44 2 Texas 2013 377 25 Utah
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3255983"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3255983/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3255983)