Reference health
Is More Better? Divide between Retailer's and Manufacturers' Preferences for Reviews and Review Monetization
1 of 21 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74
The 20 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/dir.10073
Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?
resolves10.1287/isre.2014.0520
Product Fit Uncertainty in Online Markets: Nature, Effects, and Antecedents
resolves10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.01
Know Yourself and Know Your Enemy: An Analysis of Firm Recommendations and Consumer Reviews in a Competitive Environment1
resolves10.1287/isre.2017.0750
Extrinsic versus Intrinsic Rewards for Contributing Reviews in an Online Platform
resolves10.1287/isre.2013.0511
Online Product Reviews: Implications for Retailers and Competing Manufacturers
resolves10.25300/misq/2017/41.3.05
Platform or Wholesale? A Strategic Tool for Online Retailers to Benefit from Third-Party Information1
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2014.2082
Do I Follow My Friends or the Crowd? Information Cascades in Online Movie Ratings
resolves10.25300/misq/2017/41.4.14
Revealing or Non-Revealing: The Impact of Review Disclosure Policy on Firm Profitability1
resolves10.2307/25750706
Price Effects in Online Product Reviews: An Analytical Model and Empirical Analysis1
resolves10.2753/mis0742-1222270401
Product Reviews and Competition in Markets for Repeat Purchase Products
resolves10.1287/isre.1120.0454
Promotional Marketing or Word-of-Mouth? Evidence from Online Restaurant Reviews
resolves10.1287/isre.2013.0508
Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry
resolves10.1287/mksc.21.3.273.137
When Good News About Your Rival Is Good for You: The Effect of Third-Party Information on the Division of Channel Profits
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2125526
Does Paying for Online Product Reviews Pay off? The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Consumers’ Product Evaluations
resolves10.1509/jm.74.2.133
Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedWord-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis
no DOI — not checkedref24
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3271069"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3271069/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3271069)