Reference health

Fundamental Analysis and Mean-Variance Optimal Portfolios

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3300976
CiteStamped reference-health badge
23/23 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 23 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/0015198x.2019.1600958
In Defense of Portfolio Optimization: What If We Can Forecast?
resolves10.1007/s11142-018-9470-2
Quality minus junk
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.002
Accruals, cash flows, and operating profitability in the cross section of stock returns
resolves10.3905/jpm.2019.45.3.038
Clash of the Titans: <i>Factor Portfolios versus Alternative Weighting Schemes</i>
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.08.001
In short supply: Short-sellers and stock returns
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3206798
The Characteristics of Factor Investing
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.03.004
The relation between corporate financing activities, analysts’ forecasts and stock returns
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhp003
Parametric Portfolio Policies: Exploiting Characteristics in the Cross-Section of Equity Returns
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2613366
Accounting Data, Market Values, and the Cross Section of Expected Returns Worldwide
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00164
What is the Intrinsic Value of the Dow?
resolves10.1561/1400000022
Alphanomics: The Informational Underpinnings of Market Efficiency
resolves10.1561/104.00000024
The Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns
resolves10.1007/s11142-013-9227-x
Dynamic risk, accounting-based valuation and firm fundamentals
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.03.001
The cross section of expected holding period returns and their dynamics: A present value approach
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
PORTFOLIO SELECTION*
resolves10.2469/faj.v45.n1.31
The Markowitz Optimization Enigma: Is ‘Optimized’ Optimal?
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhv063
A Taxonomy of Anomalies and Their Trading Costs
resolves10.3905/jpm.2014.40.3.137
Recent Trends in Equity PortfolioConstruction Analytics
resolves10.1201/9781420010794
Quantitative Equity Portfolio Management
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.008
Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances
resolves10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.823
The Use of DuPont Analysis by Market Participants
resolves10.1086/295508
How to Use Security Analysis to Improve Portfolio Selection
resolves10.2308/accr.2001.76.3.357
The Mispricing of Abnormal Accruals
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedPortfolio optimization with noisy covariance matrices
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref26
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3300976"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3300976/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3300976/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3300976)