Reference health

The State of Corporate Disclosure on Well-being: A Review of Corporate Reporting Practices in the Food and Agriculture Sector in 2018

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3313568
CiteStamped reference-health badge
25/25 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 25 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005
An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains
resolves10.1016/j.accfor.2015.10.001
Corporate reporting on corruption: An international comparison
resolves10.1021/acs.est.5b03709
Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Estimation for the Global Burden of Disease 2013
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.013
Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade
resolves10.1021/acs.est.5b02507
Quantifying Land Use Impacts on Biodiversity: Combining Species–Area Models and Vulnerability Indicators
resolves10.1016/j.accfor.2010.07.001
Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035012
Environmental impacts of food trade via resource use and greenhouse gas emissions
resolves10.1162/glep_a_00015
Tamed Transparency: How Information Disclosure under the Global Reporting Initiative Fails to Empower
resolves10.1073/pnas.1509433112
Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change
resolves10.1002/bse.729
Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis
resolves10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z
Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states
resolves10.1126/science.1244693
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
resolves10.2308/accr-51191
An Analysis of Firms' Self-Reported Anticorruption Efforts
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.030
Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034015
Rapid growth in agricultural trade: effects on global area efficiency and the role of management
resolves10.1093/biosci/biu225
Rethinking Agricultural Trade Relationships in an Era of Globalization
resolves10.1126/science.341.6147.740
Growing Up With Pesticides
resolves10.1177/1467358415600210
Corporate nonfinancial disclosures: An illuminating look at the corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting practices of hospitality and tourism firms
resolves10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001
GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability
resolves10.1038/ngeo2635
Substantial nitrogen pollution embedded in international trade
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.002
An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports
resolves10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.03.001
Consumers’ willingness-to-pay for organic conversion-grade food: Evidence from five EU countries
resolves10.1126/science.aao3895
Scientifically assess impacts of sustainable investments
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00319.x
Occupational Health and Safety Management in Organizations: A Review
resolves10.1038/nature15743
Managing nitrogen for sustainable development
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAs the research continues to question what the right metrics are for measuring business impacts on well-being, the question of company's role in producing such data is critical. Most probably, independent data, produced by new technologies, such as satellites, social media, employment data, justice data, and environmental sensors, will provide a new generation of impact measurements
no DOI — not checkedFish Consumption Effects
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedRethinking Environmental/Social/Governance Metrics for the Mainstream Investors
no DOI — not checkedCan corporate reporting help end poverty
no DOI — not checkedOccupational health and safety in corporate social responsibility reports
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Responsible Business Conduct Matters
no DOI — not checkedReport by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedref36
no DOI — not checkedref38
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3313568"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3313568/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3313568/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3313568)