Reference health
Algorithm Aversion in Financial Investing
40/40 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-01
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 40 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1002/jcpy.1266
Consumers Object to Algorithms Making Morally Relevant Tradeoffs Because of Algorithms’ Consequentialist Decision Strategies
resolves10.1177/0956797620948841
People Reject Algorithms in Uncertain Decision Domains Because They Have Diminishing Sensitivity to Forecasting Error
resolves10.1037/xge0000033
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01598.x
Luck versus Skill in the Cross‐Section of Mutual Fund Returns
resolves10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4
Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE
resolves10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.
resolves10.3905/jpm.2017.43.4.055
Man vs. Machine: <i>Comparing Discretionary and</i><i>Systematic Hedge Fund Performance</i>
resolves10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00058.x
Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection
resolves10.1111/1911-3846.12641
The Effect of Humanizing <scp>Robo‐Advisors</scp> on Investor Judgments*
resolves10.1016/j.frl.2022.103046
The potential use of robo-advisors among the young generation: Evidence from Italy
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2020.101573
Financial education and digital asset management: What's in the black box?
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005
Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment
resolves10.1002/bdm.637
The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments
resolves10.1016/j.jedc.2019.03.002
Determinants of investor expectations and satisfaction. A study with financial professionals
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-812282-2.00021-8
Inclusion or Exclusion? Trends in Robo-advisory for Financial Investment Services
resolves10.1177/0272989X12453501
Why Do Patients Derogate Physicians Who Use a Computer-Based Diagnostic Support System?
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedThe promises and pitfalls of robo-advising
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedRobo-advice and the future of delegated investment
no DOI — not checkedInvestor characteristics and their impact on the decision to use a robo-advisor
no DOI — not checkedref44
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-01 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3364850"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3364850/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3364850)