Reference health

Googlization and Retail Investors’ Trading Activity

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3370658
CiteStamped reference-health badge
54/54 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 54 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6
Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhu059
Investor Attention and Stock Market Volatility
resolves10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.034
Investor attention and stock market activity: Evidence from France
resolves10.1007/s11408-011-0165-y
Google search volume and its influence on liquidity and returns of German stocks
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00226
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
resolves10.1162/003355301556400
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
resolves10.1257/jep.15.1.41
The Internet and the Investor
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm079
All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.05.004
Subjective financial literacy and retail investors’ behavior
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.020
A cultural explanation of the foreign bias in international asset allocation
resolves10.1016/j.irfa.2016.03.015
Google searches and stock returns
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00883.x
Household Finance
resolves10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00130-7
How does the Internet affect trading? Evidence from investor behavior in 401(k) plans
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.04.001
Cognitive abilities and portfolio choice
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x
In Search of Attention
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhu072
The Sum of All FEARS Investor Sentiment and Asset Prices
resolves10.1086/261703
Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1040.0473
Up Close and Personal: Investor Sophistication and the Disposition Effect
resolves10.3917/fina.382.0007
Investor sentiment and stock return predictability: The power of ignorance
resolves10.1111/eufm.12058
Can Internet Search Queries Help to Predict Stock Market Volatility?
resolves10.1016/j.intfin.2015.04.001
Retail investor attention and stock liquidity
resolves10.1007/s10679-005-4997-z
Talk and Action: What Individual Investors Say and What They Do
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00443.x
Investor Information Demand: Evidence from Google Searches Around Earnings Announcements
resolves10.1016/j.frl.2011.10.003
Measuring economic uncertainty and its impact on the stock market
resolves10.1016/j.intfin.2015.05.001
Investor attention and FX market volatility
resolves10.1093/rof/rfn005
Equity Portfolio Diversification
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1090.1009
Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00355
How Distance, Language, and Culture Influence Stockholdings and Trades
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.08.008
Financial advisors: A case of babysitters?
resolves10.2307/2235407
Why do so Few Hold Stocks?
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.005
Forecasting volatility with empirical similarity and Google Trends
resolves10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.003
Investor attention and short-term return reversals
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.002
Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.007
Individual investor perceptions and behavior during the financial crisis
resolves10.1093/rof/rfr022
The Trading Volume Impact of Local Bias: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
resolves10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.11.001
Forecasting abnormal stock returns and trading volume using investor sentiment: Evidence from online search
resolves10.1016/j.econmod.2015.04.005
How does Google search affect trader positions and crude oil prices?
resolves10.1257/jel.52.1.5
The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x
A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information
resolves10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.048
The use of open source internet to analysis and predict stock market trading volume
resolves10.1207/s15427579jpfm0603_4
Social Mood and Financial Economics
resolves10.1016/j.irfa.2018.11.002
The effects of markets, uncertainty and search intensity on bitcoin returns
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.05.003
Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning
resolves10.1111/jofi.12179
The Media and the Diffusion of Information in Financial Markets: Evidence from Newspaper Strikes
resolves10.2307/2534436
Stock Prices and Social Dynamics
resolves10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00029-1
Implications of rational inattention
resolves10.1108/RBF-04-2018-0033
Investor attention using the Google search volume index – impact on stock returns
resolves10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.01.003
Google search intensity and its relationship with returns and trading volume of Japanese stocks
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006
Financial literacy and stock market participation
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.02.007
Information demand and stock market volatility
resolves10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.010
Investor attention, index performance, and return predictability
resolves10.1080/1540496X.2015.1046339
Investor Attention, Institutional Ownership, and Stock Return: Empirical Evidence from China
resolves10.1016/j.econmod.2013.03.018
Open source information, investor attention, and asset pricing
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedBitcoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era
no DOI — not checkedAttributes of news about firms: an analysis of firm-specific news reported in the
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3370658"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3370658/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3370658/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3370658)