Reference health

Dispelling Misconceived Beliefs About Rent Control: Insights from a Field and a Laboratory Experiment

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3384538
CiteStamped reference-health badge
70/70 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 70 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3386/w24003
When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?
resolves10.1093/scan/nss099
The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making
resolves10.1257/jel.53.2.285
Research on Teaching Economics to Undergraduates
resolves10.1080/10835547.2012.12092062
Elimination of Rent Control in the Swedish Rental Housing Market: Why and How?
resolves10.1787/5kgk8t2k9vf3-en
Housing Markets and Structural Policies in OECD Countries
resolves10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
resolves10.1515/9781400829828
Mostly Harmless Econometrics
resolves10.1177/0963721417699026
Psychological Misconceptions: Recent Scientific Advances and Unresolved Issues
resolves10.1177/0193841x8400800205
Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs
resolves10.1093/rof/rfx022
Emotional State and Market Behavior
resolves10.1037/a0032627
The influences of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts.
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2019.101455
Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when
resolves10.1080/00220670903383101
The Nature of the Refutation Text Effect: An Investigation of Attention Allocation
resolves10.1080/00220485.2017.1285735
Students' persistent preconceptions and learning economic principles
resolves10.1007/s10648-014-9284-0
The Nature and Development of Critical-Analytic Thinking
resolves10.1162/rest.90.3.414
Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00041
Systematically Biased Beliefs about Economics: Robust Evidence of Judgemental Anomalies from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy
resolves10.1186/s40173-016-0069-6
Misperceptions of unemployment and individual labor market outcomes
resolves10.1257/jep.26.3.157
Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions
resolves10.1093/jeea/jvaa051
How do People Choose Between Biased Information Sources? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
resolves10.3386/w25482
Monetary Policy Communications and their Effects on Household Inflation Expectations
resolves10.1257/0002828054201431
Are Two Heads Better Than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games
resolves10.1093/restud/rdx031
The Demand for Bad Policy when Voters Underappreciate Equilibrium Effects
resolves10.1257/aer.20171330
Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand
resolves10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124309
Persuasion: Empirical Evidence
resolves10.1086/701354
Who Wants Affordable Housing in Their Backyard? An Equilibrium Analysis of Low-Income Property Development
resolves10.1017/s1049096515000438
Communicating Policy-Relevant Science
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2574521
Bootstrap Methods for Inference with Cluster Sample IV Models
resolves10.1257/089533005775196732
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
resolves10.1257/000282803769206188
The Misallocation of Housing Under Rent Control
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.007
Time varying risk aversion
resolves10.1177/0042098007087341
A New Measure of the Local Regulatory Environment for Housing Markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index
resolves10.1016/b978-0-444-59531-7.00019-3
Regulation and Housing Supply
resolves10.1257/pandp.20181082
Central Bank Communications and the General Public
resolves10.1111/ecoj.12213
The Impact of Supply Constraints on House Prices in England
resolves10.2307/2951620
Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2011.06.006
Economic experts or laypeople? How teachers and journalists judge trade and immigration policies
resolves10.1086/684629
Economists and Public Opinion: Expert Consensus and Economic Policy Judgments
resolves10.1017/bpp.2016.2
Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511803475.002
Choices, Values, and Frames
resolves10.1080/00220973.2015.1027806
Optimizing Conditions for Learning: Situating Refutations in Epistemic Cognition
resolves10.1080/00986280902959986
The Effect of Refuting Misconceptions in the Introductory Psychology Class
resolves10.1037/stl0000082
Reducing students’ misconceptions with refutational teaching: For long-term retention, comprehension matters.
resolves10.1037/stl0000054
Refutation texts: Overcoming psychology misconceptions that are resistant to change.
resolves10.3386/w20609
Behavioral Economics of Education: Progress and Possibilities
resolves10.3386/w18165
The Behavioralist Goes to School: Leveraging Behavioral Economics to Improve Educational Performance
resolves10.1177/1529100612451018
Misinformation and Its Correction
resolves10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It
resolves10.1177/2053168016645137
How group discussions create strong attitudes and strong partisans
resolves10.1080/00220485.2014.889538
Using Field Experiments to Change the Template of How We Teach Economics
resolves10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.09.001
A formative assessment of students’ algebraic variable misconceptions
resolves10.1257/jel.52.1.5
The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.1111/mbe.12043
Differences in Brain Activation Between Novices and Experts in Science During a Task Involving a Common Misconception in Electricity
resolves10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.03.007
The effect of housing supply regulation on housing affordability: A review
resolves10.1021/ed069p191
Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions
resolves10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
resolves10.1257/jep.34.3.220
Facts and Myths about Misperceptions
resolves10.5408/15-109.1
Refutation Texts for Effective Climate Change Education
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning
resolves10.1002/qj.3829
Issue Information
resolves10.1257/aer.103.3.636
Economic Experts versus Average Americans
resolves10.31228/osf.io/qn5wp
How People Update Beliefs about Climate Change: Good News and Bad News
resolves10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
REFUTATION TEXT IN SCIENCE EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF TWO DECADES OF RESEARCH
resolves10.1017/S1930297500007622
Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test
resolves10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test
resolves10.1080/17470216008416717
On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task
resolves10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.065
Commentary to: How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public
resolves10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z
Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments
resolves10.1111/ectj.12107
The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters
resolves10.1177/1536867x19830877
Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedThe Regulation of Residential Tenancy Markets in PostWar Western Europe: An Economic Analysis
no DOI — not checkedPublic Understanding of Economics and Economic Statistics
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedSelf-contradictions
no DOI — not checkedref79
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3384538"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3384538/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3384538/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3384538)