Reference health

MiFID II Unbundling and Sell Side Analyst Research

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3408198
CiteStamped reference-health badge
28/28 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-23

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1086/209721
Does It All Add Up? Benchmarks and the Compensation of Active Portfolio Managers
resolves10.1111/jofi.12180
Shaping Liquidity: On the Causal Effects of Voluntary Disclosure
resolves10.1016/0165-4101(89)90008-6
Firm characteristics and analyst following
resolves10.1007/s11142-009-9086-7
Are analysts’ earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts?
resolves10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.227
Do Investors Respond to Analysts' Forecast Revisions as if Forecast Accuracy Is All That Matters?
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.03.005
Investment banking relationships and analyst affiliation bias: The impact of the global settlement on sanctioned and non-sanctioned banks
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.09.007
Disclosure and agency conflict: Evidence from mutual fund commission bundling
resolves10.1007/s11142-009-9116-5
Analyst reputation and the issuance of disaggregated earnings forecasts to I/B/E/S
resolves10.1007/s10693-015-0222-1
Mutual Funds’ Soft Dollar Arrangements: Determinants, Impact on Shareholder Wealth, and Relation to Governance
resolves10.1007/s11142-020-09545-w
The effects of MiFID II on sell-side analysts, buy-side analysts, and firms
resolves10.2307/2491360
The Relative Informativeness of Analysts' Stock Recommendations and Earnings Forecast Revisions
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.004
Determinants of the informativeness of analyst research
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2018.3182
Regulations and Brain Drain: Evidence from Wall Street Star Analysts’ Career Choices
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.037
Should information be sold separately? Evidence from MiFID II
resolves10.1093/pan/mpr025
Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies
resolves10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1683
Competition and Bias
resolves10.1086/467066
Change at the Exchange: The Causes and Effects of Deregulation
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhr134
Testing Asymmetric-Information Asset Pricing Models
resolves10.2308/accr.2010.85.6.2047
Do Supplementary Sales Forecasts Increase the Credibility of Financial Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts?
resolves10.2308/accr-52280
Analyst Coverage and Expected Crash Risk: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage
resolves10.2308/accr-51418
Come on Over: Analyst/Investor Days as a Disclosure Medium
resolves10.2308/accr.00000043
The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00382.x
The Information Content of Forward‐Looking Statements in Corporate Filings—A Naïve Bayesian Machine Learning Approach
resolves10.1093/jfr/fjaa008
Unregulated Algorithmic Trading: Testing the Boundaries of the European Union Algorithmic Trading Regime
resolves10.2308/accr-10034
What Makes Conference Calls Useful? The Information Content of Managers' Presentations and Analysts' Discussion Sessions
resolves10.1111/jofi.12485
Does the Scope of the Sell‐Side Analyst Industry Matter? An Examination of Bias, Accuracy, and Information Content of Analyst Reports
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00271.x
DELEGATED PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT: A SURVEY OF THE THEORETICAL LITERATURE
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.11.002
What determine financial analysts’ career outcomes during mergers?
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFixing Soft Dollars Is Not That Hard: A Consent and Reporting Framework for Regulating Client Commission Arrangement
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedWhat is Mifid II and how will it affect EU's financial industry?
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedConflicts of interest and stock recommendations: The effects of the global settlement and related regulations
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedThe Dangerous Rise of Sponsored Stock Research
no DOI — not checkedref42
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3408198"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3408198/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3408198/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.3408198)